home of the wildlife conservation environmental
and freedom activist

Environment Action
Alerts for March 24 - March 31, 2002
 

Citi Earth Action Week
Empowering Democracy
Environmental Education
Programs At Risk
Alaska Rainforest Protection
Opportunities Building

Tell Park Service to Protect
Coral Reef Ecosystems Now
Showdown in Congress: Forest
Protection Lobby Week 6/2-7
ETC Geno-type

Greenpeace Positive
Energy March 18-26
Urgent: Ecuadorian
Tree Sitters Evicted
Take Action to stop
Arctic Drilling today!

NRDC Earth
Action 3/27/02
We Need Your Help Budget to Protect & Restore
National Forests & Grasslands

Save Yellowstone
From Snowmobiles
Protect Rock Creek Roadless
Area from Oil & Gas Invasion
Illegal Incarceration
of Mindo Activists

EarthNet News
March 29, 2002
Greenpeace Positive
Energy March 29, 2002




from Rainforest Action Network March 25, 2002

In this Post :
1. REFUSE Citi! Earth week of Action April 22-26th
2. ECUADOR/OCP Treesit Update and
3. EMPOWERING DEMOCRACY CONFERENCE spotlights
Citigroup! Sign Up! Volunteer! Come Protest Citi
Shareholder's meeting in NYC!

* * * * * *
#1

Global warming *** Predatory Lending *** Corporate
Globalization *** Forest Destruction *** Attacking
Indigenous Rights *** Global Destruction ***

STOP CITIGROUP EARTHWEEK ACTIONS EARTHWEEK
REDUCE, RESUE, RECYCLE, REFUSE “TO DO BUSINESS WITH
CITI! : APRIL 22nd – 26th

HELLO CITI-STOPPERS:

With Earthweek coming up on April 22nd – 26th 2002,  
it’s time to add the fourth “R” to Earthweek’s
triple “R” demand - Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and REFUSE!  
Refuse to do business with Citigroup!  Refuse to let
Citi use your money to fund global warming and global
forest destruction. Citizens and communities concerned
with our global environmental crisis have tremendous
power over mega-banks like Citi..  Recently, Dutch bank
ABN-Amro’s decision to refuse funding for resource
extraction related investments within pristine forests
set a precedent for banks to finally take
responsibility in their investment practices.   
With the pressure heating up, Citi knows that the
public will not accept excuses for funding global
warming and the subsequent destruction of our planet.
Mass species extinction, submersion of countries due to
rising sea levels, and the spread of diseases are the
result of our deadly fossil fuel addiction. As the
largest financial institution in the world and the #1
financier of fossil fuel projects, Citi  determines
what gets  funding and what does not. As a financial
powerhouse, the world’s largest bank must take
responsibility for its actions. Citi must stop
profiting from this deadly industry and begin financing
clean alternatives, such as solar and wind.  Citi’s
destructive practices span across the globe, fueled by
its profits from the fossil fuel industry..
With the Middle East becoming increasingly unstable,
Citi has turned its investments to the Amazon, fueling
an oil boom in pristine rainforest ecosystems and on
sacred indigenous lands. Citi has chosen to act as
financial advisor for the deadly Camisea project.  A
gas pipeline cutting its way through the Lower
Urumbamba region of the Peruvian Amazon, this project  
is jeopardizing pristine ecosystems and indigenous
cultures who choose to live in voluntary isolation
rather than have their traditional way of life
threatened.  This region is one of the most
biologically diverse areas in the world.  800 species
of birds and trees will be affected by the
construction.  The very survival of two indigenous
tribes is highly jeopardized by this project that has
already proven deadly for the Nahua peoples.  During
preliminary exploration in the Camisea region, the
Nahua were exposed to whooping cough and influenza
epidemics that killed off an estimated 50 percent of
the tribe’s population.Illegal road construction has
already begun, paving the way for further profits at
the expense of innocent lives.  

Citi’s destruction can be traced from redlining and
predatory lending, indebting people of color in our
inner cities, to participating in the OCP / Ecuador
pipeline where activists have put their bodies on the
line to save their treasured forests. From Citigroup’s
partnership with Enron in the contested Dabhol power  
plant in India to profiting from global warming,
Citigroup lives up to its reputation as the World’s
Most Destructive Bank. On Earth Day,  send a strong
message that now is the time to REFUSE Citi, and tell
them“Not with My Money!”Use the solidarity of the Earth
Day celebrations in your community to Reduce, Reuse,
Recycle and Refuse to do business with Citigroup!
The power is in the Public! Close your Citibank
accounts.  Cut up your Citibank credit cards and save a
Citi customer! Talk to folks, let them know that their
money is being used to fund the world’s most
destructive bank. Do a Protest at a Citibank, Salomon
Smith and Barney, Traveller’s Insurance, Citifinancial
or a Primerica and send a message that Citi must rule
in favor of human rights and environmental justice
instead of shortsighted corporate greed.  Organize an
action on April 22nd 2002 or any day that week. Travel
to any number of actions in the major cities around the
US being organized. It’s a week of actions to stop
Citi’s selling of the planet.  

LET’S STOP CITI FROM FINANCING FOSSIL FUELS
AND TELL THEM TO FINANCE CLEAN ENERGY! TELL CITI’S
FUNDING OF DESTRUCTION
“NOT WITH MY MONEY, CITI”

For more info contact Matt Prescott with SEAC in
Philadelphia at
IMPULSE275@aol.com  215-222-4711

Emma Kelty, at Grinnell College, Des Moines,
<mailto:ftp@grinnell.edu>.

Mark Von Topel with Powershift in DC at
mark.vontopel@shiftpower.org
<mailto:mark.vontopel@shiftpower.org> (202) 299-9096,

Sabrina Alonso and Sasha Baxter at at Rainforest Action
Network in San Francisco at
sabrina@ran.org <mailto:sabrina@ran.org> 415-398-4404
ext 309

For more info on the Citi campaign go to
http://www.ran.org or
www.shiftpower.org

JOIN THE CAMPAIGN FOR A SANE ECONOMY - a low-density,
announcement-only list serve about the campaign to
transform the global financial system by targeting
Citigroup, the world’s most destructive bank.
TO SUBSCRIBE send a blank email to
stopciti-updates-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

* * * *
#2 ECUADOR : ACTIVISTS REMAIN IN TREES.  OCP’S
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT’S POSSIBLE REINSTATEMENT ENDANGERS
TREESITTERS!

(check www.ran.org and www.amazonwatch.org for pictures
and updates)

On March 6, Ecuador's environmental ministry
temporarily revoked OCP's environmental license for the
Mindo region until environmental damage done during
construction of the pipeline right of way has been
repaired. The suspension comes just hours after the
government reached an agreement with Amazonian
communities of the Sucumbios and Orellana provinces who
had paralyzed commerce in the region and brought oil
production to a near stand still over OCP construction
and long over looked social and economic conditions in
the impoverished region.

According to OCP, they expect to have the environmental
permit reinstated within the next two weeks and then
plan to restart construction in the Mindo Nambillo
Protected Forest. The consortium also expects to begin
preliminary work on the ridgeline of Guarumos within
the next few weeks, where tree sitters celebrated their
75th day blockading the pipeline's passage. Local
activists report that the base of the mountain, one of
the access routes for supplies to the tree sitters is
now controlled 24hrs a day by a handful of Ecuadorian
military soldiers.

Please send an email or fax to the Ministry of the
Government of the Republic of Ecuador, Marcelo Merlo.
Spanish is best but any language will do.
Let the government of Ecuador know that the tree sit
and encampment at Mindo has international support!

EMAIL :Dr. Marcelo Merlo Jaramillo
Ministro de Gobierno y Policia
despacho@mingovierno.gov.ec
FAX: 593 2 2 583 356

Also cc the Subsecretaria de Policia:
subpol@mingobierno.gov.ed

Let him know that OCP’S permit should not be reinstated
and we are watching this eviction, and the police
conduct and treatment of activists, from around the
world.

* * * *
#3 EMPOWERING DEMOCRACY CONFERENCE spotlights
Citigroup! Sign Up! Volunteer! Protest the Citi
Shareholder’s meeting!


EMPOWERING DEMOCRACY: CHALLENGING CORPORATE POWER AND
DEMANDING ACCOUNTABILITY CONFERENCE
The second annual skills training for corporate
campaigners, a project of the Corporate Campaign
Working Group- environmental, human rights and labor
organizations working together to challenge corporate
power and demand
accountability.

April 13-15, 2002, New York City

From Enron to Exxon, Dow to Dupont, Citigroup to
Chevron, corporations are growing more powerful than
governments, violating human rights, decimating our
environment, and destroying cultures worldwide. Join
the nation's most successful corporate campaigners in a
three day conference and skills share on how to run and
win corporate campaigns! Examine not only how to
leverage power against corporations, but also how to
join in a growing global movement challenging corporate
power.

Speakers include:
Randy Hayes, Rainforest Action Network
Lori Wallach, Global Trade Watch
Carlos Beas Torres, UCIZON
Kevin Danaher, Global Exchange
Theresa Amato, CitizenWorks
Lladen Tethong, Students for a Free Tibet
Charlie Cray, Multinational Monitor
Lucas Benitez, Coalition of Immokalee Workers
Kathy Mulvey, Infact
Florence Robinson, Cancer Alley activist
Susana Almanza, PODER
and more.......

Skills trainings in:
Researching Corporations
Influencing a Corporate Board
Direct Action
Legal Tools to Take on Corporations
Corporate Citizenship
Culture Jamming
Shareholder Activism
Globalization
Divestment
Grassroots Power
...and more...

To Apply or for more information, check
www.empoweringcemocracy.org. Some scholarships may be
available.  Apply fast –limited spaces are available.

The conference needs volunteers!If you would like to
come, but are on a budget, you can get the fee waived
by dedicating a some time and working with and meeting
phenomenal activists from around the world! For info on
volunteering contact: Molly@larosa-ranch.com

Stay after the conference to use your newly acquired
skills at a day of action against The World’s Most
Destructive Bank, Citigroup! From predatory lending in
our inner cities to predatory investments in fossil
fuels and mining in the earth’s endangered ecosystems,
Citigroup profits from environmental and social
devestation.  Stand together with a broad coalition of
groups and tell Citi “Not with My Money!” No longer
will we tolerate our credit card balances and savings
accounts going towards fossil fuel projects in the
Amazon Basin, logging endangered orangutan habitat in
Indonesia, and stramming economically disadvantaged
people through predatory lending and international
debt.  Citi is the world’s largest financial
institution and directly contributes to global warming,
the erosion of democracy through political bribery and
architecting global trade agreements. Have a presence
at the annual shareholder meeting the day after the
conference and let the Citigroup Board, shareholders,
and executives know that we demand an ecolological sane
economy!

*  The Corporate Campaign Working Group is a coalition
of Campaign ExxonMobil, AFL-CIO, CERES, Power Shift, Co-
op America, Corporate Campaign, Global Exchange,
Infact, ICCR, RAN, Texas Sustainable Energy and
Economic Development (SEED) Coalition, STARC, Tri-State
Coalition for Responsible Investment, CorpWatch,
Friends of the Earth, US PIRG, Action for Community and
Ecology, Free the Planet!, Health Care Without Harm,
Institute for a Sustainable Future, PODER, Strategic
Counsel on Corporate Accountability, ForestEthics and
Students for Economic and Environmental Justice.


from World Wildlife March 25, 2002

If you are already a WWF Conservation Action Network member, see below
for how to take action.  If you received this email from a friend,
please visit the Conservation Action Network Web site at
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/ to take action on this issue.

Federal environmental education programs are facing a serious threat.
President Bush is proposing that next year's budget abolish the
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) long standing and highly
successful environmental education initiative and move the function of
environmental education to the National Science Foundation (NSF).  

EPA currently awards more than 200 grants each year to schools, nature
centers, museums, and other institutions.  Its overhead is lean and
its impact is great, reaching 50,000 to 100,000 educators a year.  The
program meets the highest standards for educational rigor and
adherence to scientific accuracy.

Moving the program to NSF could severely weaken our nation's
environmental education.  With such a transfer, it is likely there
will be far fewer awards and they will be made primarily to higher
education institutions.  The awards would also be mostly focused on
science, eliminating the important multidisciplinary approach of EPA's
program.

PLEASE FOLLOW THE SIMPLE STEPS BELOW TO SEND A FREE MESSAGE URGING
YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES TO OPPOSE THE TRANSFER.

**********************TAKE ACTION NOW!****************

To send the message below, as is, to your congressional
representatives, hit "reply" to this email and then "send."  We will
automatically send the messages for you.  However, we urge you to
greatly increase your impact by adding your own thoughts to your
message.  Personalizing your message only takes a minute; see below
for details.

ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND INCREASE YOUR IMPACT  

Log in to your Personal Action Center
(http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/login.asp)  with your email
address and your password.  (If you have
forgotten your password, follow the instructions on the log-in page to
have a new password emailed to you.)

Once you are in your Personal Action Center, click on "Environmental
Education Programs At Risk" and follow the instructions for adding
your own thoughts to your messages.  

Please forward this alert to your friends and colleagues.

*********************LETTER TEXT******************

Dear  (your senators' and representative's names will be inserted
here):

I am greatly concerned about the environmental literacy of our nation.
Therefore, in your personal request to the VA, HUD, and Independent
Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee, I urge you to oppose the plan to
abolish environmental education at the Environmental Protection Agency
and to move the function of environmental education to the National
Science Foundation.  Instead, I believe the federal function for
environmental education should remain at EPA with an increase in
funding beyond its current $7.3 million level.

Moving environmental education out of EPA would be a major setback.  
EPA has built a highly effective and popular interdisciplinary program
that trains and educates young people, educators, business, and the
public to understand and grapple with the environmental challenges of
today and tomorrow.  At NSF, the program would be narrowed, shifted
from its multidisciplinary approach to more of a science program, and
would lose its access to EPA's wealth of environmental knowledge and
"real world" perspective.

I strongly support the current Congressional mandate for a strong,
interdisciplinary environmental education program housed at EPA.  
Environmental education creates an informed citizenry that has the
knowledge and skills to understand complex environmental issues and
make responsible decisions.  By supporting environmental education, we
are ensuring that our country will be able to sustainably manage our
valuable natural resources and compete in a global economy.

Please do all you can to guarantee that federal environmental
education efforts remain strong.

Sincerely,

Your name and address
will be inserted here

______________________________________________________________________
Direct any questions about the WWF Conservation Action Network to
actionquestions@takeaction.worldwildlife.org
______________________________________________________________________
The Conservation Action Network is sponsored by World Wildlife Fund-
US.  Known worldwide by its panda logo, WWF is dedicated to
protecting the world's wildlife and the rich biological diversity
that we all need to survive.  The leading privately supported
international conservation organization in the world, WWF has
sponsored more than 2,000 projects in 116 countries and has more than
1 million members in the United States.  WWF calls on everyone --
government, industry, and individuals -- to take responsibility by
taking action to save our living planet.

World Wildlife Fund
1250 Twenty-fourth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20037
http://www.worldwildlife.org
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org


from Alaska Rainforest Campaign March 25, 2002

ALASKA WILDERNESS - COSPONSOR DRIVE SURGES AHEAD

The Alaska Rainforest Conservation Act (H.R. 2908), introduced in September 2001 by Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D - CT) and Connie Morella (R - MD), continues to draw new co-sponsors.  Currently 109 members of Congress have signed on to this historic bi-partisan legislation, which would protect over 14 million acres of threatened lands in the Tongass and Chugach National Forests in Southern Alaska.  As threats surface daily of new timber sales and road construction in currently roadless areas of these two magnificent forests, more and more members of Congress are heeding the demands of their constituents that these areas be protected.  As the ranks of Congressional co-sponsors continue to swell, the imperative of providing permanent legislative protection for these two forests will become an irresistible force! To find out more about the bill and whether or not your Member of Congress is a co-sponsor, visit the Alaska Rainforest Campaign's Take Action site (www.akrain.org).


TONGASS WILDERNESS PLAN TO BE UNVEILED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

This spring the development of a new Tongass Wilderness Plan will provide Alaska Wilderness supporters with the opportunity to help safeguard the remaining unprotected temperate rainforest wildlands on the Tongass National Forest. By court order, the U.S. Forest Service has had to revisit its management blueprint for the Tongass National Forest. Originally developed in 1997, the Tongass Land Management Plan (TLMP) was ruled illegal because it failed to consider new wildlands eligible for long-term protection under the National Wilderness Preservation System. As a result, the USFS will issue a supplemental plan which we expect to include an Alaska Rainforest Conservation alternative. Stay tuned for information on how you can participate in the upcoming 90-day public comment period.

****

For more information on either effort contact:

Laurie Cooper
Forest Outreach Director, Alaska Coalition
laurie@alaskacoalition.org

Thanks for your support.

Alaska Rainforest Campaign Staff.


from the Ocean Conservancy March 25, 2002

The National Park Service has failed to implement new
and expanded ocean National Monuments established more
than a year ago to protect beleaguered coral reef ecosystems.
Please respond to this alert and let the Park Service
Director know that she must act now to protect the
U.S. Virgin Islands Coral Reef National Monuments.
If you have time please try to edit the letter below.

You can take action on this alert either via email
(please see directions below) or via the web at:
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/USVirginIslands/wkwxs5r278x38e

Visit the web address below and tell your friends to
take action on this important campaign!
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/USVirginIslands/forward/wkwxs5r278x38e

We encourage you to take action by April 10, 2002

Tell the Park Service to Protect U.S. Virgin Islands
Coral Reef Ecosystems Now!

----------------------

In January 2001, then President Clinton created the
new U.S. Virgin Island Coral Reef National Monument
and expanded the boundaries of the existing Buck Island
Reef National Monument (collectively referred to as
the U.S. Virgin Islands Coral Reef National Monuments),
to restore and protect the degraded, but extraordinary,
coral reef ecosystems of the Virgin Islands.  

These areas were selected for national monument designation
to protect the extraordinary diversity of marine life
and unique tropical ecosystems of the Virgin Islands.
Protection is needed because overfishing has depleted
reef fish populations and undermined the health of
coral reef ecosystems in these areas.

Well over a year later, however, the National Park
Service (NPS) has yet to develop important regulations
and management plans to protect these vital ocean areas.
As a result, these monuments are merely lines on a
map without any protection on, or in, the water.

To make matters worse, we understand that, even as
you read this alert, these areas face increasingly
intensive fishing pressure that is further damaging
these remarkable ocean ecosystems.

It is essential to the survival of these coral reef
ecosystems that NPS avoid any further delay and move
immediately to develop regulations and management plans.
In implementing the Executive Orders establishing the
monuments, NPS should set aside these areas as fully
protected, no-take marine reserves, where all extractive
uses, including fishing, are prohibited. This action
will help these remarkable areas and the ocean life
they support recover. The National Academy of Sciences'
National Research Council has concluded that fully
protected, no-take marine reserves are proven tools
for restoring and protecting marine ecosystems and
can be key to recovering depleted fish populations.

In addition, as NPS moves forward it should provide
for substantial education and outreach to local stakeholders
to gain their support and involvement in ensuring these
monuments are a success.

Park Service action is long overdue. Please respond
to this alert immediately and send NPS Director Fran
Mainella a message urging her to act immediately to
implement the vital U.S. Virgin Islands Coral Reef
National Monuments.

If at all possible please try to edit the sample letter
to reflect your own words. Thank you for your help.

----------------------

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:
If you have access to a web browser, you can take action
on this alert by going to the following URL:

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/USVirginIslands/wkwxs5r278x38e  

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:
Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email
program, and edit the letter below as you wish. Do
not delete "-YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW-" and "-END
OF LETTER-". Please do not add your name and address
to your letter. Our system automatically does this
for you.  

We STRONGLY encourage you to make edits directly to
our sample letter below, and put the alert talking
points into your own words. An individualized letter
is worth ten computer generated letters. Of course,
hundreds of unedited letters will still create a large
impact, so please reply even if you don't have time
to personalize the letter.

Your letter will be addressed and sent to:
Director Fran Mainella


-------YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW---------

I urge you to act immediately to protect the coral
reef ecosystems of the U.S. Virgin Islands by implementing
the U.S. Virgin Islands Coral Reef and Buck Island
Reef National Monuments without any further delay.
These monuments were established more than a year ago,
yet the National Park Service still has not developed
any regulations or management plans for these areas.
As a result of this delay, the monuments remain simply
"lines on a map," while increasing overfishing continues
to degrade these vital coral reef ecosystems.

The Park Service must immediately publish regulations
implementing these monuments as fully protected, no-take
marine reserves, stopping all extractive activities,
including fishing, so that these beleaguered marine
ecosystems can recover. There is tremendous public
support for the establishment of no-take marine reserves
in U.S. ocean waters and the National Research Council
has endorsed their use as an effective marine conservation
and management tool.

Beyond implementing these monument designations, you
must also ensure that adequate funding is provided
for the management and enforcement of these areas.
This funding is a critical investment toward ensuring
that the ecological health of these areas is restored.
In addition, the Park Service should begin an aggressive
public outreach and education effort to garner support
and involvement of local stakeholders in the implementation
of these monuments.  

Please move immediately to implement the U.S. Virgin
Island Coral Reef and Buck Island Reef Monuments, without
further delay. Thank you for considering my views.

-------END OF LETTER-------------------------


from American Lands March 25, 2002

To: All Activists
From: Steve Holmer
Date: March 25, 2002

Showdown in Congress: Forest Protection Lobby Week June 2 - 7

With new roadless area timber sales being offered each month and
numerous other rollbacks of forest protection underway we need help from
Congress to stop the Bush Administration and the Forest Service from
succeeding with these attacks.  While the news seems to be going from
bad to worse, by acting together, we can turn the tide and create a
powerful backlash for forest protection.

To help make that happen, all activists are invited to join activists
from across the nation for our annual Forest Protection Lobby Week June
2 -7.   This is right before the House of Representatives votes on the
Interior Appropriations bill.   

WE NEED EVERYONE TO COME TO DC THIS YEAR

This year, we know that much is at stake.  The Forest Service is moving
rapidly to dismantle the roadless conservation rule while it is tied up
in court and is pushing forward new roadless area timber sales.  Without
action by Congress, these areas will remain at risk.  This year will be
an all-out lobby blitz to pass permanent legislation protecting roadless
areas and stopping Forest Service rollbacks.

Fire and restoration funding and policy have dominated the Interior bill
the last several years and we expect a major fight once again to reign
in the abuse of restoration and hazardous fuel treatment funds being
diverted for commercial logging.   We are also may be fighting
provisions to increase subsidies for biomass from the National Forests.

Lack of enforcement of off-road vehicles and the agencies failure to
monitor their impacts is allowing for unacceptable damage to the public
lands.  This year, we will ask Congress to start tackling this problem
by asking for additional funding for monitoring and requiring a portion
of the law enforcement budget be spent policing off road vehicles.

If you, or someone you work with is interested in coming to Washington
this June, or at any time of the year to lobby for your forest
protection priorities, please contact Steve Holmer at 202/547-9105, or
mailto:wafcdc@americanlands.org    American Lands offers travel
assistance (usually ½ airfare) and can often find free host housing with
our staff or local supporters.  


Steve Holmer
Campaign Coordinator
American Lands
726 7th Street SE
Washington, D.C. 20003
202/547-9105
202/547-9213 fax
mailto:wafcdc@americanlands.org
http://www.americanlands.org


from ETC Group March 25, 2002

Monday, March 25th, 2002
Patenting Elements of Nature:
No Patents on Non-Life Either!

Governments at the UN are meeting this week to prepare for a painful evaluation of "Agenda 21", the environmental work plan that came out of the Earth Summit ten years ago. Among the issues on the New York agenda will be biotechnology, Terminator technology, and "life" patent monopolies. Meanwhile, unnoticed by policy-makers, the nanotech industry is acquiring the same broad-spectrum patents that have spurred monopoly in biotechnology. Patenting at the nano-scale can mean monopolizing the basic elements that make life possible. Could nanotechnologists patent elements in the Periodic Table? It wouldn't be the first time!

What is nanotechnology? A nano is a measurement equaling one-billionth of a meter. Nanotechnology is a very broad term referring to an array of technologies encompassing everything from the manufacture of nano-scale materials (the commercial manufacture of bulk sprays, powders and coatings is already big business), to the fabrication of structures utilizing the quantum physics of nano-scale materials, to the futuristic and hotly debated goal of creating self-replicating nano-robots. Some argue that self-replicating nano-machinery is beyond the realm of possibility while others, including ETC group, believe that the real question is not if, but when. It is clear that every industry and technology will be affected by nanotechnology in the future. ETC group is completing a kit for civil society organizations and policy makers on nanotechnology for release in April/May.

Summit plans miss mark: Two weeks of meetings begin at the United Nations today to prepare for the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD). The Heads of State summit, scheduled for Johannesburg, South Africa (Aug. 26 - Sept. 4) will review the embarrassing lack of progress in achieving a sustainable environment and economy since the 1992 "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janeiro. In the ten years since Rio, governments and civil society activists have seen biotechnology and intellectual property move from the wings to centre stage in debates over world food and environmental security. The New York negotiations will talk about both "life" patent monopolies and the risks involved in GM crop contamination. Governments have neither nanotechnology nor material patents on their agenda. As usual, they are running a decade behind reality.

From "life" patenting to ...? The starting gun for the privatization of what eventually became known as biotechnology went off in 1980 when the US Supreme Court decided, in a 5-4 decision, that an oil-guzzling microbe developed by General Electric was patentable. The US court's verdict signaled to the chemical and pharmaceutical industries that the world's most commercially important patent regime was open to patenting any and all forms of life.

Two decades later, many patent attorneys would concede that "life" patents are in chaos. Forty-six percent of all biotech patents challenged in US courts are overturned. At an average cost, per litigant, of $1.5 million, patent lawsuits are the fastest growing item on court dockets in the USA and many start-up biotech "boutiques" now allocate more money to intellectual property lawyers than to their scientists. (See ETC Communique #73, "New Enclosures", November/December, 2001.)i

That even the Gene Giants are finding patents painful gives civil society organizations small solace. CSOs (including some environmentalists who sat on their hands in 1980 because they were persuaded that the patented oil-eating microbe would combat oil spills - it never did) have watched in horror as the scope of biotech patents has exploded beyond all recognition. Twenty years down the road, there are patents on genes, gene sequences, entire species, on human cell lines and on indigenous knowledge. Patents have been granted to companies for uses that have been known for thousands of years and biopirates are laying claim to so-called "inventions" they scooped up from farmers' markets and rain forests. The thievery has become a global pandemic.

Patents on Non-Life: But biotech's critics have become so focused on the "no patents on life" campaign (a campaign to which ETC group fully subscribes) that all of us have overlooked the patents "underneath". The fast-moving nanotechnology industry is busily acquiring patents on the material building blocks and processes that make everything from dams to DNA. Because nanotech spends little time talking about living materials, few have realized the implications for health, agriculture and the environment if fundamental patents on nature's raw materials go unopposed.

From bio to nano: In a speech last April, a lobbyist with the US Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) , ventured boldly onto the turf of the Gene Giant's nano neighbours: "It is true that one cannot patent an element found in its natural form; however," said Lila Feisee, "if you create a purified form of it that has industrial uses - say, neon - you can certainly secure a patent."ii Feisee, BIO's Director for Government Relations and Intellectual Property, should know. The biotech industry has turned the isolation and purification of known genes (for the purpose of patenting) into an art form.

"Elements, my dear Watson ... and Crick": Of the roughly 112 known elements so far (a handful come and go or are in dispute), 22 elements are human-made. There will be more. Are they patentable? Glenn Seaborg, the American who won a Nobel Prize for Physics in 1951, couldn't see why not. He "invented" Americium #95 and acquired US patent #3,156,523 on November 10th, 1964. Seaborg's decision to patent contrasts with the explicit choice made by Pierre and Marie Curie of France: they opted not to patent Radium #88 or Polonium #84. For their selfless decision, the Curies were awarded the Davy Medal by London's Royal Society 99 years ago. Ironically, Seaborg marked the Curie's stand by naming his second "invented" element, Curium #96, after them - U.S. patent # 3,161,462 granted December 15th, 1964. Years after their initial discovery of Radium, Marie Curie reflected on the "fortune" she and her husband sacrificed to keep the element in the public domain. "Yet," the Nobel Laureate concluded, "I still believe that w
Sure enough, there exists a general doctrine in patent law that products of nature cannot be patented. The prohibition on product of nature patents was rendered vacuous by the 1980 Supreme Court decision. Today, with the world's largest corporations gearing up to work down at the nano-level, it is only a matter of time before industry convinces patent examiners that the genetically-engineered microbe of twenty-two years ago is no different from the atomically-engineered elements of today. Between nuclear colliders, atomic force microscopes, and cameras that can photograph light as it meanders through a retina, the nanotech industry will be in a political position to argue that any tinkering with the elemental products of nature is patent-worthy.

Little patents with a giant reach: But nanotech is also following biotech's passion for sweeping product and process patent claims that could tie up the technologies involved and give a handful of giants monopoly over the tools that will be used to manufacture everything. Everything includes the raw materials essential to life.

Buckyballs: Consider C Sixty Inc., a Toronto, Canada-based start-up nanotech enterprise, that seems to be rapidly cornering the market on a rare form of carbon first discovered in 1985.iv Carbon is an essential component to everything living on earth. This remarkable carbon was named "Buckminsterfullerene" (or "Fullerene" or "Buckyball") because of its geodesic (soccer ball) shape.v Essentially, buckyballs are a hollow sphere comprised of 60 carbon atoms. By the mid-90s, fullerene compounds were seen to have vast potential in drug delivery related to the treatment of disease. A series of patents was filed, five of which have been granted. The patents are the core assets of C Sixty Inc. As Uri Sagman, C Sixty's CEO told NanotechPlanet, "If people want to get in this game they have to deal with us." Sagman stresses, "We're, in a true sense, a platform company that is able to license out enabling technology and partner [with other drug development companies]"vi

Buckytubes: C Sixty Inc. is not alone in exploiting carbon. Carbon Nanotechnology Inc. (CNI - Houston, Texas) has an exclusive license for a broad array of technologies developed by Dr. Rick Smalley at Rice University. Smalley, too, won a Nobel Prize for Physics and co-founded CNI on the side. The existing patents (and applications) cover the four commercially viable routes to making and using - not Buckyballs but Buckytubes (nanotubes). Nano-scale tubes of carbon atoms have an enormous range of pharmaceutical and other uses. Buckytubes are the most important material in nanotechnology today.vii

Blocking the view: Not all the nanotech work is on carbon atoms. Microvision, another U.S. "nano-niche" (the nano industry's equivalent to biotech's "boutiques") start-up in Bothel, Washington, uses nano-scale technologies for visual display and image capture devices. So far, the company claims more than 150 patents but many more are in the pipeline. Steve Willey, executive vice president told Small Times, "At some point you corner an industry. ... There is value in getting critical mass." Casey Tegreene, who handles the company's patents, agrees, "Building an unassailable patent portfolio is an important component of our overall growth strategy...''viii

Chips off a new block: Nanotechnology is also making huge inroads into the informatics industry and much work is being done with nano-scale materials for semiconductors. One of the lead "nano-nichers" in this field is Quantum Dot Corporation (Hayward, California). QDC is the world leader in nanocrystal technology commercialization for use in biological, biochemical, and biomedical applications. The company's strategy is to achieve broad-spectrum coverage of semiconductor nanocrystal technologies. "We continue to dedicate our efforts to compiling, generating, and protecting pioneering technology...," QDC states.ix

As it was with the biotech "boutiques", however, nanotech's "nano-nichers" are going to have to scramble to win patent dominance in manufacture. QDC is rubbing elbows with giants like Hewlett-Packard in the semiconductors market and H-P is working in a consortium to develop molecular switches and other nano-scale materials that could transform the informatics industry quickly. One of its molecular patents was ranked by MIT's Technology Review as among the five most important patents of 2000. As is increasingly the case, many of the nanotech initiatives are being bankrolled by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).x

Patently worried: "Our big issues are making sure that the USPTO [US Patent and Trademark Office] understands nanotechnology, so when people come with their patents, examiners understand what are reasonable boundaries," says Mark Modzelewski, of the NanoBusiness Alliance (a New York-headquartered industry trade association). "We would not like to see, within nanotechnology patents, some of the things we've seen in recent technology waves, where there have been concept patents awarded, which allow people to lock up huge areas. That's a real fear for us in nanotechnology."xi

Those of us in advocacy groups and others in civil society who have been concerned about GMOs and "life" patents may still regard the sudden rise of nanotechnology as extraneous to our main concerns. Not for long. According to the NanoBusiness Alliance, nearly half of the pharmaceutical industry market (or around $180 billion per annum) will be based on nanotechnology within 15 years. NBA believes that 22% of the potential business for nanotech will be linked to biotechnology in the life sciences.xii A market study just released by CMP Cientifica (an investment group in Madrid, Spain) sees agriculture as next in line after medicine as a potential market for nanotech: "...genetic engineering methods are moving along quite nicely without any need to call themselves nanotechnology."xiii Likewise, nanotech is progressing quite nicely without any need to tell the world that it is tinkering with the fundamentals of all life and matter.

Perhaps the best opportunity for governments and civil society to come to grips with new technologies such as nanotech and new monopoly control threats such as patents on elements in the Periodic Table, will be during the Johannesburg Summit this August. Among the proposals that should be debated by governments in New York this week and next is an International Convention for the Evaluation of New Technologies (ICENT).


For further information:
Pat Roy Mooney: etc@etcgroup.org (204) 453-5259 CST - Winnipeg
Hope Shand: hope@etcgroup.org (919) 960-5223 EST - North Carolina
Silvia Ribeiro: silvia@etcgroup.org (52) 55-55-63-26-64 CST - Mexico City
The Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration, formerly RAFI, is an international civil society organization headquartered in Canada. The ETC group is dedicated to the advancement of cultural and ecological diversity and human rights. www.etcgroup.org. ETC group wishes to acknowledge and thank Mathieu Charron, a valued volunteer, for his considerable contribution to the research involved in this report.

Endnotes:
i See ETC group website: http://www.etcgroup.org/article.asp?newsid=271.
ii Lila Feisee, Director for Government Relations and Intellectual Property, Biotechnology Industry Organization, in a speech entitled, "Anything Under the Sun Made by Man," delivered at Case Western Reserve School of Law, April 11, 2001.
iii For more information, see: http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/Curie/1921.html. Marie Curie made her speech in the USA in 1921 on a fundraising trip for her Radium institute.
iv See CSixty's website: www.csixty.com/mission.
v Buckminster Fuller, an engineer and architect who died in 1983, promoted the geodesic dome as the ideal design for shelter construction.
vi B. Allen, "CSixty pioneers drug delivery techniques using buckyballs," NanotechPlanet, January 16, 2002; available at www.nanotech-planet.com.
vii "Carbon Nanotechnologies, Inc. licenses buckytube production process to DuPont," NanotechPlanet, January 9, 2002, available at www.nanotech-planet.com; see also Carbon Nanotechnologies Inc.'s website: www.cnanotech.com/4-2_intellectual.cfm.
viii J. McIntyre, "Microvision piles up patents in retinal display technology" Small Times, February 20, 2002; available at www.smalltimes.com.
ix From Quantum Dot's company website, www.qdots.com/new/corporate/ip.html.
x Hewlett-Packard news release, "GP, UCLA collaboration receives key molecular electronics patent", January 23, 2002; available at www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/23jan02b.htm.
xi D. Brown, "U.S. Patent examiners may not know enough about nanotech," Small Times, February 4, 2002, www.smalltimes.com.
xii N. Tinker, 2001 Business of Nanotech Survey, NanoBusiness Alliance, October 2001, p.16.
xiii CMP Cientifica, March 11, 2002, p.23. www.CMP-Cientifica.com.


from Greenpeace March 26, 2002

March 18-26, 2002
 
Happy Spring.
Spring springs eternal, and so does our hope that we
will deal with climate change. To keep you posted on
progress to that end it is time now for "Positive Energy" -
Greenpeace's CLEAN ENERGY NOW! update.


+++ COLLAPSE OF ANTARCTIC ICE SHELF: ANOTHER WAKE UP
CALL TO THE WORLD +++
During a 5-week period, a piece of the Larsen Ice Shelf
with a surface area of 1,250 square miles dramatically
splintered into a plume of drifting icebergs. This enormous
floating ice shelf, designated Larsen B-22, has existed
since the last Ice Age but collapsed during on of the
warmest summers recorded on the Antartic Peninsula. Although
scientists stopped just short of straight out blaming
this event on global warming caused by human activity, they
noted that the ice shelf has persisted through 12,000
years of climate changes, well before civilization began
altering the environment. Both the United States' and British
agencies are attributing the collapse and the general trend
of retreating shelves to warmer temperatures (+2.5 degrees C)
over the past 50 years, supporting arguments that greenhouse
gases emission is a critical issue that all nations must
address alongside their energy concerns.

Check out the following links for pictures and
related articles:
http://cybercentre.greenpeace.org//t/s/1016626265/index_html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1880000/1880566.stm

+++ TELL EDISON NOT TO DUMP COAL IN THAILAND +++

Greenpeace in the United States and South East Asia are
demanding that Edison Mission Energy, a sister company to
Southern California Edison, stop its plans to build a huge
coal-fired power plant in the rural village of Bo Nok,
Thialand. Local people fromm this Thai fishing and
farming community have been fighting the power plant proposal
for eight years. In January, 10,000 people demonstrated
against the Edison plant when the Prime Minister visited
the area. Greenpeace is trying to bring the outrage of the
community home to the company that is providing the cash
to build the coal plant in Bo Nok. Edison has also been
heavily involved in greenwashing the plant proposal in
Thailand - placing ads in the national newspapers, claiming
that they will burn "Clean Coal" and that this plant could
be built in California. This statement is simply not true
from an air quality standards point of view, and certainly
a coal power plant would not be built on a beach in
southern California but that is where they plan to build
in Thailand.

To Take Action, just go to:
http://www.cleanenergynow.org/bin/takeaction.fpl?action_id=116

+++ INDIAN SCIENTIST WINS ASHDEN AWARD FOR RENEWABLE
ENERGY +++
Dr. A. D. Karve, the head of India's Appropriate Rural
Technology Institute (ARTI), was announced as the 2002
winner of the prestigious Ashden Award for Renewable
Energy. The Princess Royal of the United Kingdom presented
the world's only award for renewable energy work during
the Whitley Laing Foundation's annual awards ceremony held
in London last Friday evening. Dr. Karve received international
recognition for his role in the discovery and implementation
of a unique technology that produces clean fuel from sugarcane
waste that would otherwise have been burnt at site; thus
converting a large scale environmental problem into an
income-generating opportunity while providing desperately
needed clean and cheap domestic fuel to rural families
throughout the region. To find out more about Whitley Laing
Foundation and the Award for Renewable Energy, just go to:

http://www.whitely-award.org
----------------------------------------------------------
The "Positive Energy" newsletter and our website,
http://www.cleanenergynow.org, will give you good news
about ways to achieve clean air, climate justice, and
renewable energy solutions to our ongoing energy crisis.


from Rainforest Action Network March 26, 2002

In this post:

#1 Summary of Activities in Ecuador in the last 36 hours
#2 Past Statement by Julia Butterfly Hill on Ecuadoran Tree Sit
#3 Press Release from Accion Por La Vida
#4 Contact numbers for support
#5 Press Release in Spanish

#1 Summary of events

Friends,

The brave tree sitters who have been physically blocking the Mindo pipeline,
a Citi backed project, since January 2nd were forcibly removed yesterday by
the government Special Forces. Remember, this was the first such tree sit in
the country of Ecuador and could serve as a test of how such non-violent
protestors are dealt with in the future. In response, 50 of the fellow
townspeople blockaded the road up to the pipeline site overnight. They
convinced two truck drivers to divert their pipeline materials to the town
where locals confiscated their load and set to painting the new pipe in the
town square. It is critical that we show our outrage at this time for the
mistreatment of the Mindo Youth who were putting their bodies on the line to
defend the Mindo Cloud Forests. See address at the bottom for e-mail address
to support the detained activists.

The best way to be certain these personal sacrifices are not necessary in
the future is to get the World's Most Destructive Bank to stop financing
fossil fuel exploration! Citi is the #1 funder of these types of activities
and we see the results in the destroyed forests, the displacement of
indigenous people and our planet heating up. It is time to kick the fossil
fuel habit! Call Citigroup (# below) and tell them not only to assure the
safe release of the Mindo Youth but also to stop funding for projects that
result in the destruction of our ecosystems!

#2
Julia Butterfly Hill, known worldwide for her two year long tree sit atop a
threatened 2000-year-old redwood tree in northern California made this
statement in January:

"When we see these Ecuadorian activists willing to put their bodies where
their beliefs are, risking serious danger and hardships, we know that all
other systems are failing-- corporations, governments, and consumers-all
failing in their responsibility to the planet, the people, and the future. I
stand in solidarity with my brothers and sisters of Ecuador as they stand
against this absolute greed, destruction, and consumption of these priceless
and diverse ecosystems. The annihilation of this forest and all its
inhabitants for the laying of the oil pipeline and extraction of oil is
absolutely wrong-- morally, socially, culturally, and ecologically. I and
many others are deeply committed to helping the Ecuadorian people stop this
crime against humanity and the Earth."

#3 Press Release
ECUADORIAN MILITARY FORCIBLY EVICTS ENVIRONMENTALISTS IN MINDO!
SEVENTEEN ACTIVISTS ARE CURRENTLY BEING DETAINED!
URGENT LETTERS NEEDED TO DEMAND THEIR RELEASE! (see addresses below)

Mindo, Ecuador March 26 2002
PRESS RELEASE
URGENT
Police forcibly remove peaceful protestors from their camp in Cerro
Guarumos. Inhabitants of Mindo take control of main highway demanding the
release of the 17 detained activists. Yesterday, at about 12pm, the National
Police Group of Intervention and Rescue forcibly entered the Guarumos
protest camp and arrested three Ecuadorians and fourteen foreigners that
were at the site. Since January 2, a permanent group of activists had been
occupying the most sensitive area of the Mindo-Nambillo Protected Forest in
order to impede the advancement of the heavy crude oil pipeline (OCP). Their
intention was to not leave the occupied area until the construction company
and the government gave up their intention to destroy this unique ecosystem
which houses an incredible diversity of flora and fauna, some of which are
in danger of extinction. The activists are detained in the Provisional
Detention Center. There are 17 in total, among them local Ecuadorian
activists and international activists from France, United States, Ireland,
Italy, Germany and Switzerland. The hearing to resolve the situation of the
detained protestors will be today at 10am at the Pichincha Police Commission
in Quito.
Last night at 8pm around 60 people, men and women of the town of Mindo,
blocked the main highway from Quito to Los Bancos in the sector known as the
Mindo Y. The inhabitants of Mindo took control of the road from 8pm last
night until 4 am this morning in response to the arbitrary arrest of the
peaceful activists trying to stop the construction of the heavy crude oil
pipeline at the camp in Cerro Guarumos. Two large trailers carrying numerous
pipeline tubes were brought down by activists from the main highway to the
town of Mindo and are currently being held in the middle of town, with all
24 tires deflated. The drivers of the trucks are passive towards the Mindo
activists, both have decided to stay with the trucks. Phrases like "OCP out
of our town" have been painted by activists on the huge tubes located on the
back of the trucks. The people of Mindo will let the trucks go as soon as
all 17 detained protestors have been released from custody.
In this same Guarumos area where the peaceful protest camp was, the Ministry
of the Environment revoked OCP's environmental license due to poor practices
in the construction process that have caused serious environmental damages.
The report however only refers to the service road to Cerro Guarumos and
does not incorporate an inspection of the damages within the Mindo-Nambillo
Protected Forested that have been greater that those of the service road.
The environmental damages and the lack of following the construction
regulations that were stated in the Environmental Plan, have occurred in all
areas where the pipeline construction continues and have been documented by
Accion Ecologica in Quito.
The construction of the heavy crude oil pipeline continues at a fast pace,
blatantly ignoring the opposition of the local towns and governments y in
complete violation of constitutional precepts, environmental protection laws
and the human rights of the inhabitants of the affected areas along the
pipeline route.
We at Accion Por La Vida, the grass roots group from Mindo that has risen up
since the protest against the OCP pipeline started over two years ago,
demand the immediate release of those detained whose only crime is defending
the Ecuadorian patrimony and humanity. We also reaffirm our struggle against
the construction of the OCP pipeline and we declare that these types of
repressive measures will not stop us from continuing our struggle.


#4 Contact Info
!!PLEASE TAKE ACTION AND EMAIL/FAX THE BELOW ADDRESSES AND DEMAND THE
PROTESTERS BE SET FREE!!

Presidente de la República del Ecuador
Dr. Gustavo Noboa Bejarano
Calle García Moreno y espejo
Fax: (5932 ) 2584518
Correo electrónico: desp-@presidencia.ec-gov.net

Ministro de Defensa
Almirante Hugo Hunda
Av. Maldonado y calle Exposición 208
Fax: (5932 ) 2580431.

Jefe del Comando Conjunto de las Fuerzas Armadas
Oscar Isch
Comando Conjunto de las Fuerzas Armadas
Fax: (5932) 2583394
coma-@uio.satnet.net

Ministro de Gobierno y Policía
Dr. Marcelo Merlo
Fax: (5932) 2580067
Ecuadoran Embassy in the United States
Tel. 202-234-7200
embassy@ecuador.org

cc: all e-mails to
E-mail: oilwatch@uio.satnet.net
Pagina Web: www.oilwatch.org.ec

CALL CITI'S INVESTOR RELATIONS :
1-888-250-3985 and dial 0 until you reach a human operator.

Tell them to use their influence to halt this destructive project and to
stop funding destructive activities such as fossil fuel development and
logging. As financial backers of the project, they have influence over how
these situations unfold. Let them know that we hold them accountable for the
welfare of each of the arrested tree-sitters.

See http://www.ran.org/ran_campaigns/citigroup/cs_ocp.html and
www.amazonwatch.org for background info and updates.

#5 Press Release in Spanish

[espanol]

Quito, 25 de marzo del 2002

BOLETIN

DE PRENSA

URGENTE

Fuerzas policiales desalojaron por la fuerza el campamento de los
ecologistas en Guarumos

El día de hoy, cerca del medio día, un comando del Grupo de Intervención y
Rescate de la Policía Nacional irrumpió por la fuerza en el campamento
de Los Guarumos y tomó presos a los ecuatorianos y extranjeros que se
encontraban en ese momento en el sitio. Desde el 2 de enero, un grupo
permanente de activistas se había instalado en la zona más frágil del Bosque
Protector Mindo Nambillo, para impedir el avance de la
construcción del Oleoducto de Crudos Pesados. Su intención era no abandonar
la zona hasta que la empresa constructora y el gobierno
desistan de su intención de destruir éste ecosistema único, que alberga una
diversidad de especies animales y vegetales, muchas de las cuales
están en peligro de extinción.

Es en esta misma zona de Guarumos donde el Ministerio del Ambiente retiró la
Licencia Ambiental al Consorcio, debido a que sus malas
prácticas en el proceso de construcción que han causado grave deterioro
ambiental. El informe se refiere únicamente a la vía de acceso al cerro
Guarumos, pero no incorpora una inspección a las obras dentro del Bosque
Protector Mindo-Nambillo, donde los daños han sido aún mayores. Los
daños ambientales causados y los incumplimientos de las normas de
construcción a las que se compromente el OCP en el Plan de Manejo
Ambiental se repiten en todas las áreas en donde la construcción del
oleoducto avanza y han sido documentados por Acción Ecológica para
exigir al Ministerio del Ambiente el retiro definitivo de la Licencia
Ambiental.

La construcción del Oleoducto de Crudos Pesados sigue avanzando a un ritmo
desenfrenado, pasando por encima de la oposición de las
poblaciones y los gobiernos locales, y en completa violación de preceptos
constitucionales y legales de protección del medio ambiente y
de respeto a los derechos humanos de los habitantes de las zonas por donde
atraviesa.

A través de la prensa, exigimos la inmediata libertad de todos los detenidos
cuyo único delito es defender el patrimonio natural de los
ecuatorianos y de la humanidad, y responsabilizamos al Ministerio de
Gobierno por su integridad. Al mismo tiempo, nos reafirmamos en nuestra
lucha en contra de la construcción del OCP, y declaramos que este tipo de
medidas represivas no nos detendrán.

Natalia Arias

170849278-8

Acción Ecológica

Quito, March 25th, 2002



Presidente de la República del Ecuador
Dr. Gustavo Noboa Bejarano
Calle García Moreno y espejo
Fax: (5932 ) 2584518
Correo electrónico: desp-@presidencia.ec-gov.net
<http://www.topica.com/lists/amazonwatch_update/read/message.html?mid=160654
2219&sort=d&start=3>

Ministro de Defensa
Almirante Hugo Hunda
Av. Maldonado y calle Exposición 208
Fax: (5932 ) 2580431
Correo electrónico: midenasocial@org

Jefe del Comando Conjunto de las Fuerzas Armadas
Oscar Isch
Comando Conjunto de las Fuerzas Armadas
Fax: (5932) 2583394
coma-@uio.satnet.net
<http://www.topica.com/lists/amazonwatch_update/read/message.html?mid=160654
2219&sort=d&start=3>

Ministro de Gobierno y Policía
Dr. Marcelo Merlo
Fax: (5932) 2580067


from Care2 alerts March 27, 2002

Please join over 65,000 others who have already signed
this petition, sponsored by the American Wilderness
Coalition.  Your comment will be sent to your Senators.
They do care what their voters want - so please make
your voice heard today. Then, ask 3 friends to sign
too - we want to send the Senate over 100,000 signatures
before they vote.

Your voice does matter - please make your comment today:
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/3738

Confused about the facts? Heard various stories on how
damaging drilling will be? Here is the truth:

**********FAST FACTS -- THE TRUTH*************

** Pro-drillers are claiming that only 2,000 acres of
the Arctic refuge will be affected. It is the myth of
the 2,000 acre footprint! THE TRUTH: refuge oil is
scattered and oil companies will need to create miles
of pipelines and roads all across the Refuge. The
pro-drillers are only counting the ground that actually
touches the posts or other drilling equipment towards
that 2,000 acres; bare ground under the pipeline and
roads that destroy the landscape aren't included, even
though they destroy the ecosystem.

** Drilling in the Refuge won't cut prices at the pump!
The amount of oil that the Arctic could produce is not
enough to even make a ripple in the global oil market.
Regardless of production in the Arctic, most of the oil
is produced by OPEC, an oil cartel, and will continue
to determine the price of oil at U.S. pumps.

** Even if Arctic drilling occurs, lengthy processing
and drilling will prevent us from seeing any Arctic oil
for 10 years and then it will only last 6 MONTHS! In
fact, according to recent editorials, most oil companies
aren't even sure that the gain from production would be worth
the time and effort that would be needed to get at it
because of the poor quality of the oil.

** There are other ways to solve the oil shortage! A
mere two-mile-per-gallon improvement in auto efficiency
would save that same amount of oil in under 3 years,
and keep on saving.

** Arctic Drilling WILL NOT reduce our dependence on
foreign oil. The U.S. has 2.8% of the world's known
petroleum reserves. We consume over 25% of all oil
produced. Refuge oil would AT MOST, increase our
reserves by a mere 1% percent -- we'll need to get the
remaining 21% percent from foreign producers. That isn't
independence!

Click here to register your opposition:
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/3738

**************TAKE ACTION NOW****************
It is crucial that we all do as much as we can to stop
a bill that will cost us all a great deal for very little
gain. If you have already signed the House petition, then
we need you to sign this Senate Petition as well. AND
please ask your friends to sign as well!

It is no contest. We can't take the risk of destroying
Precious Arctic lands and wildlife, when the gain is
so little and there are clear, easy and lasting
alternatives!

Take Action to stop Arctic Drilling today!
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/3738

Thank You for taking Action
The PetitionSite Team!


from Natural Resources Defense Council March 27, 2002

========================================
NRDC's EARTH ACTION:
The Bulletin for Environmental Activists

March 27, 2002
========================================
In This Issue:

--Action alerts--

1. HABITAT PRESERVATION: Tell the Bush administration to protect
Wyoming's Powder River Basin from the harmful effects of oil and gas
drilling

--Updates on Previous alerts--

1. SENATE ENERGY BILL

======================================================
You will also find these alerts in NRDC'S Earth Action Center, which
includes tools for taking action easily online, at
http://www.nrdc.org/action

(Please do not reply to this message; see the instructions below for
how to unsubscribe or contact NRDC with questions or comments.)

=============
Action alerts
=============

1. HABITAT PRESERVATION
Tell the Bush administration to protect Wyoming's Powder River Basin
from the harmful effects of oil and gas drilling

Bordered by the beautiful Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming's Powder River
Basin is home to dozens of bird species, hundreds of thousands of
pronghorn antelope and mule deer, twelve thousand elk, and at least
fifteen other sensitive species, including the white-tailed prairie
dog. Set in a unique landscape of craggy mountains, rolling hills, and
sweeping plains, the region has a rich Native American history and
strong connections to the local rural and agricultural communities.

The Bush administration is now considering a proposal to drill more
than 50,000 coalbed gas wells and 3,000 oil wells in the Powder River
Basin. The proposed plan (the largest natural gas project ever
considered by the federal government) would lead to the construction
of 17,000 miles of new roads and 20,000 miles of pipelines across
200,000 acres of sensitive, and largely undeveloped, agricultural
land. Most of the 1.5 trillion gallons of contaminated water produced
by the drilling would be intentionally dumped or leaked, untreated,
into the ground, eventually making its way into streams and rivers.

Despite these facts, the Bureau of Land Management has analyzed only
two development alternatives, both of which would allow the full
number of wells requested by industry, ultimately leading to
significant, and potentially irreversible, damage to the region's
soil, water and wildlife (the BLM's own analysis shows that the
proposed development would destroy wildlife habitat to such an extent
that many animals would not survive). In response, local and regional
groups have developed their own proposal for the area -- the Citizens'
Alternative -- that would minimize harm to the region and its
wildlife.

The BLM is accepting public comments on the proposed alternatives
through April 18th.

== What to do ==
Send a message to the BLM before the April 18th comment deadline,
urging the agency to consider and adopt the Citizens' Alternative --
and to take all possible steps to reduce environmental damage to the
area.

== Contact information ==
You can send an official comment directly from NRDC's Earth Action
Center at http://www.nrdc.org/action. Or use the contact information
and sample letter below to send your own message, and please include
your own reasons why protecting these stunning lands is important to
you.

Paul Beels, Project Manager
Bureau of Land Management
Buffalo Field Office
1425 Fort Street
Buffalo, WY 82834
Fax: 307-684-1122
Email: buffalo_wymail@blm.gov

== Sample letter ==

Subject: Powder River Basin DEIS - Increase protection for sensitive
resources

Dear Mr. Beels,

The BLM should not allow Wyoming's Powder River Basin to be overrun by
thousands of oil and gas wells. The two development alternatives the
BLM is considering would severely harm wildlife, including sensitive
species, and lead to serious water quality and other problems. Neither
of these options includes adequate measures to deal with these
problems, or to help restore the land after it is damaged.

Instead, the proposed Citizens' Alternative is based on substantial
scientific and public input and offers a balanced approach that would
minimize damage to the Powder River's precious air, soil, scenic
vistas, wildlife habitats, and rural heritage. I therefore urge the
BLM to consider this third alternative, and to ensure that any chosen
alternative fully addresses impacts to the environment and public
health of this unique region and includes plans for reducing them.

Sincerely,

[Your name and address]

==========================
Updates on Previous alerts
==========================

1. SENATE ENERGY BILL
In our last alert we asked you to urge your senators to oppose the
auto industry-sponsored Levin-Bond amendment, which would gut the
increased vehicle fuel economy provisions originally contained in the
Senate energy bill. Although you sent the Senate more than 6,000
messages in a 24-hour period, on March 13th the amendment passed,
62-38, in effect guaranteeing that the final bill will be devoid of
any meaningful fuel economy advances. Other key environmental votes on
the bill will occur when Congress returns from its two-week spring
recess, so stay tuned. In the meantime, thanks to all of you who spoke
out to hold your senators accountable for caving in to the auto
industry.

==================================================
About Our Bulletins/How to Subscribe & Unsubscribe
==================================================

NRDC distributes three bulletins by email. To subscribe to any or all
of them or to join our activist networks, go to:
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/subscribe.asp.

If you already subscribe and want to change your subscriptions or
update your email address or other information, go to:
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/profileeditor (or see the unsubscribe
information below).

EARTH ACTION is sent biweekly and calls out urgent environmental
issues requiring immediate action. To unsubscribe from Earth Action,
send an email message to earthaction@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the
subject line.

LEGISLATIVE WATCH is sent biweekly when Congress is in session and
tracks environmental bills moving through the federal legislature. To
unsubscribe from Legislative Watch, send an email message to
legwatch@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the subject line.

The CALIFORNIA ACTIVIST NETWORK ACTION ALERT is distributed monthly to
members of NRDC's California Activist Network and provides action
tools to Californians and others concerned with protecting the state's
natural resources and the health of its citizens. To unsubscribe, send
an email message to wildcalifornia@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the
subject line.

==========
About NRDC
==========

The Natural Resources Defense Council is a nonprofit environmental
organization with over 500,000 members nationwide and a staff of
scientists, attorneys and environmental experts. Our mission is to
protect the planet's wildlife and wild places and ensure a safe and
healthy environment for all living things.

For more information about NRDC or how to become a member of NRDC,
please contact us at:

Natural Resources Defense Council
40 West 20th Street
New York, NY 10011
212-727-4511 (voice) / 212-727-1773 (fax)
General email: nrdcinfo@nrdc.org
Earth Action email: nrdcaction@nrdc.org
http://www.nrdc.org

Also visit:
BioGems -- Saving Endangered Wild Places
A project of the Natural Resources Defense Council
http://www.savebiogems.org

===========


from Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund March 27, 2002

Aloha,

We need your help! There are two critical habitat proposals
in front of the US Fish and Wildlife Service right
now that need our support NOW.

The first recommends strong critical habitat designations
for plant species from the islands of Kaua`i and Ni`ihau.
Go to: http://ga0.org/campaign/kauai/w5niwb2z78xw56

The second recommends strong critical habitat designations
for Newcomb's snail, a critically imperiled native
species that is found only on Kaua`i. Go to: http://ga0.org/campaign/snail/w5niwb2z78xw56

Please visit the Earthjustice Action Center at http://ga0.org/pvtm/index.tcl?nkey=w5niwb2z78xw56
or click on one of the links above and voice your support
for these important proposals. Time is running out
- public comment will be accepted only through THIS
FRIDAY, March 29.

--------------------------------------------------

Do you care about critical habitat? Then visit the
web address below and tell your friends about this
important issue!

http://ga0.org/join-forward.html?domain=earthjusticeaction&r=Ld1aAPE1uPFH

If you received this message from a friend, you can
sign up for The Earthjustice Center at:

http://ga0.org/earthjusticeaction/join.html?r=Ld1aAPE1uPFHE


from American Lands March 27, 2002

To: All Activists
From: Steve Holmer
Date: March 27, 2002

Subject: Sign On "A Budget to Protect and Restore National Forests and
Grasslands"

The House and Senate Interior Appropriations Subcommittees are currently
accepting testimony concerning the Forest Service and BLM annual budget
for FY 2003.  Testimony is due in the House on April 5.  In conjunction
with other activists, American Lands has created our own budget
outlining how we would spend the Forest Service budget and offering some
ideas to improve agency stewardship of the public lands.

"A Budget to Protect and Restore National Forests and Grasslands and to
Protect Homes and Communities At Risk From Wildfire" is available for
your use and sign on.  It can be viewed and downloaded at
http://www.americanlands.org/fy_2003_budget.htm  

If your organization would like to sign on please contact me at
mailto:wafcdc@americanlands.org or call 202/547-9105 by next Thursday
April 4.   Individual activists are encouraged to send a copy of this to
your Representative and Senators along with a note urging them to
implement these reforms.

House Interior Appropriations Testimony Due April 5

Appropriations testimony for the House must be submitted by April 5 via
email at mailto:approp.interior@mail.house.gov   Testimony is limited to
four pages, regular type and no photos but charts and graphs are ok.  A
notice will be sent out when the Senate deadline and testimony details
are made available.  If you or your organization is submitting Interior
testimony, please consider including material from the Budget to Protect
and Restore the National Forests as well.  Thanks.  

A Budget to Protect and Restore National Forests and Grasslands

In summary, our budget proposes $452.3 million in reductions from the
Forest Products (-$278.6 million), Timber Roads (-$44.7 million),
Hazardous Fuels       (-$117.5 million) and Research (-$11.5 million)
line-items.  All of the money would be shifted into invasive species
research (+$22 million), ORV monitoring (+$20 million), restoring the
Economic Action and Pacific Northwest Assistance Programs (+$35 and +$15
million respectively), providing grants to communities and homeowners to
protect homes in the wildland/urban interface (+$200 million), and
creating a new "ecological restoration" line-item (+160.3 million).

Thus far, the Forest Service has wasted approximately half of the
hazardous fuels funding under Fire Plan by spending the money on
projects in forests where fire is not an issue, or on projects in the
backcountry far from any communities.  In addition, Forest Service
research suggests that the proper management focus should be on the
homes themselves and the area immediately surrounding them, not on
backcountry logging.  Our proposal to cut funding for hazardous fuels in
favor of a grant program for homeowners responds to these facts.   It is
an attempt to put the money where it will accomplish the goal set forth
by Congress to protect communities, while cutting a program which we
know is being heavily abused.

Other proposals include requiring NEPA compliant fire management plans
for all forests before new projects can take place; requiring that
funding for monitoring be assured before projects can begin; requiring
that 90% of the acres treated under the National Fire Plan be the
wildland/urban interface; removing incentives for logging such as goods
for services and the Salvage Fund; ending the fee demonstration program;
earmarking law enforcement funding specifically for policing off road
vehicles; prohibiting new road construction and requiring the protection
of all old growth areas.

Steve Holmer
Campaign Coordinator
American Lands
726 7th Street SE
Washington, D.C. 20003
202/547-9105
202/547-9213 fax
mailto:wafcdc@americanlands.org
http://www.americanlands.org


from Save Our Environment March 27, 2002

Action Alert - Save Yellowstone From Snowmobiles!


Action Center Update: March 27, 2002
Save Yellowstone From Snowmobiles!

Every winter the world of Yellowstone National Park is transformed from breathtaking to breath threatening, exposing wildlife, park staff, and visitors to dangerous air pollution caused by recreational snowmobile use. This winter, park rangers have had to wear respirators to combat the toxic snowmobile emissions that surround them daily. Moreover, recreational snowmobiles disturb bison and make it impossible for other visitors to enjoy the natural soundscapes of the park.

Last year, we thought the battle was over when the National Park Service announced its decision to initiate a snowmobile ban. But the $7-billion-a-year snowmobile industry sued the Park Service. Caving to industry demands, Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton has agreed to "review the finding" that led to the ban.


Take Action!

Simply reply to this email, hit send, and we'll automatically send the message below to the Park Service to be counted as an official comment.

A public comment period is now underway. The only way to defend Yellowstone and its wildlife is to demonstrate a groundswell of public support for the snowmobile ban. Please act now to let the Bush Administration know you support a clean, safe Yellowstone.

Dear Director Mainella,

I strongly support the original winter use plan that banned recreational snowmobiling from Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks. The draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement's (SEIS) "no action" alternative, which represents the original snowmobile ban, is the one the National Park Service should choose.

The costly alternatives that would allow snowmobiling in the parks would not protect the park's air, wildlife, visitors, soundscapes, and staff as they deserve. The Park Service should not have to expend extra time and money just to control the damage of a recreational activity that threatens the values of our national parks.

Snowmobiles are neither clean nor quiet enough for use in national parks, despite manufacturer claims. Furthermore, snowmobiler harassment of wildlife is difficult to control during a season when animals are under harsh stress. A guided, snowcoach-only transit system outlined in the draft SEIS would allow all people to experience the winter wonderland of both parks and would provide the parks' visitors top-quality, environment-friendly transportation.

Taking snowmobiles out of Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks is the right action. Please keep our national parks free from snowmobiles so that those of us who appreciate clean, safe places where wildlife and natural sounds are undisturbed can still enjoy a premium experience in our greatest national parks. Thank you for considering my views.

Sincerely,

More Information

Snowmobiles pollute the environment, shatter natural quiet, and disturb and harass wildlife. They do not belong in our national parks.

Help one Yellowstone grizzly stand his ground with a snowball fight!


from American Lands March 28, 2002

To: Forest Activists
From: Harlin Savage, Southern Rockies Regional Organizer
Date: March 28, 2002
Re:  HELP PROTECT ROCK CREEK ROADLESS AREA ROM OIL AND GAS INVASION!

Dear Activist:

Rock Creek, one of the biggest and most beautiful roadless areas of the
Medicine Bow National Forest in Wyoming, is being threatened by a newly
proposed oil and gas invasion.  Please send a letter today telling the
Forest Service to keep drilling rigs out of the Rock Creek Roadless
Areas.
Your comments are needed now to stop this proposal.

BACKGROUND
The Medicine Bow National Forest in south-central Wyoming is a
beautiful, biologically diverse part of the Southern Rockies.  It is also one the
most commercially exploited, with dozens of clearcuts marring the landscape.
Nearly 99% of the forest is within 2 miles of a road, and only 7% of the
Forest is protected as wilderness.  The last wild areas of the Medicine
Bow deserve the highest level of protection in order to preserve this
natural treasure.

ROCK CREEK:  A ROADLESS GEM
Covering over 20,000 acres, the Rock Creek Roadless Area on the Med-Bow
contains a deep canyon, bounded by steep forested slopes and dramatic
cliff outcrops.  The area provides habitat for elk and black bear as well as
disappearing animals like the northern goshawk, boreal owl, wood frog,
and boreal toad.  Lynx and wolverine once inhabited this wild forest.  Rock
Creek Roadless Area is also valued for the recreational opportunities it
provides.  It is a favorite destination for hikers, campers, anglers,
hunters, and mountain bikers.  It is one of the best-loved roadless
areas on the Forest.

THE THREAT:  OIL & GAS EXPLORATION COULD HARM ROCK CREEK'S WILD SIDE.
The oil industry now has the Rock Creek Roadless Area squarely in its
sights.  The industry recently submitted a proposal to conduct seismic
exploration in the area, which would require the construction of five
helicopter landing pads, potentially some logging, and the use of
portable drill rigs and explosives at 330 foot intervals over a 5-mile line
bisecting the area.  These activities could degrade wildlife habitat and the
recreation experience of visitors.  While the Forest Service has
temporarily delayed a decision on the project, it could still approve it shortly.

More frightening, oil development - with networks of roads, huge cleared
areas for drill pads, venting wells, and a maze of industrial facilities
-
could follow exploration.  Industry would not likely target this area
for expensive exploration activities unless it was likely to develop the
area.
Keeping out exploration now may save Rock Creek from later energy
development that would doom this wild area and its wild inhabitants.

In short, this is a bad proposal that the Forest Service should reject.

NO SHORTCUTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
If the Forest Service decides to consider this damaging proposal at all,
the agency must not short-circuit citizen involvement and input by excluding
this decision from required environmental review.  Industry has
apparently already pressed the Forest Service to approve the seismic exploration as
quickly as possible - by excluding it from environmental analysis.  
Given Rock Creek's incredible values, and strong public support for the area's
protection, the Forest Service must prepare a full environmental impact
statement to consider the potential impacts of multiple helicopter
landing areas, explosives, and drill rigs in important wildlife habitat and a
popular recreation area.

In addition, approval of this helicopter and ground assault could
undermine the ongoing process for updating and revising the current forest plan.  
The Rock Creek Roadless Area would be protected as a recommended wilderness
area by three of the potential long-term forest plans the Forest Service is
now analyzing.  Clearly, it is much less likely that Rock Creek will get the
protection it deserves if helicopter landing pads and drilling areas
have been built within its boundaries, and if oil and gas development
follows.
The time to protect Rock Creek is now.

SPEAK OUT TO SAVE ROCK CREEK
Please send a letter, fax, email, or make a call to the Forest Service
by APRIL 20 telling the agency to reject this seismic project and to
protect the Rock Creek Roadless Area.  In your communication, please use your
own personal experiences and write from your heart.

You may also want to include the following points:

1. The wild forests of Rock Creek are far more important for the
wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities than for any oil or gas that
might exist below its surface, and so should be protected as wilderness for
all its natural inhabitants and for the people of the United States.  The
Forest Service should flat-out reject this proposal.

2. The oil and gas project would prejudice the forest planning
process now underway by harming the unique natural qualities required for wilderness
and "research natural area" designations.  If the Forest Service intends to
consider oil and gas exploration in Rock Creek, it should not do so
until the Forest Plan has been revised.

3. The Forest Service must not push through this oil and gas
project without allowing full public participation, without evaluating its environmental
consequences, and without allowing the public the right to appeal the
decision.  The Forest Service must prepare a full "Environmental Impact
Statement" before carrying out this proposal.

4. Remind the Forest Service that the oil industry doesn't own
these wildlands; they are owned by all Americans.

Please mail, fax, email or call directly to:

Supervisor Mary Peterson
Medicine Bow National Forest
2468 Jackson St.
Laramie WY 82070
mailto:mhpeterson@fs.fed.us
Telephone:  307-745-2300
Fax:  307-745-2398

Thank you for taking the time to speak out for one of the last wild
forests on the Medicine Bow National Forest.

For more information, contact: Erik Molvar at
mailto:erik@biodiversityassociates.org  or Eric Bonds at
mailto:ebonds@biodiversityassociates.org at Biodiversity Associates
(307-342-7978).

Steve Holmer
Campaign Coordinator
American Lands
726 7th Street SE
Washington, D.C. 20003
202/547-9105
202/547-9213 fax
mailto:wafcdc@americanlands.org
http://www.americanlands.org


from Rainforest Action Network March 29, 2002

Apologies to those of you who had your e-mails returned on this very
important issue. The government had their e-mails changed when the onslaught
of support began. This glitch is due to our effectiveness, do not be fooled!
To avoid this problem in the future, we are now directing e-mails to Accion
Ecologica in Ecuador. They will print them up and hand deliver them to the
government. And don't forget to call Citi and tell them that they can no
longer continue to fund this type of social and environmental injustice and
get your business! It is time to tell them "Not with my money!"
1-888-250-3985 and dial 0 until you reach a human operator.

Below is:

#1 Update on the OCP activists
#2 Contact info for Accion Ecologica
#3 Press Release from Ecuador

We will continue to keep you posted as this story unfolds. Thanks for all of
your excellent work.


#1 OCP UPDATE
ILLEGAL INCARCERATION OF MINDO ACTIVISTS CONTINUES!
FOREIGN ACTIVISTS TO BE DEPORTED!
URGENT LETTERS NEEDED TO GET THEM RELEASED!

Ecuadorian activists and their international allies remain in custody today
after being arrested late Monday afternoon in the Mindo cloudforest region
where local residents had maintained a forest occupation since Jan 2 to
block the passage of the country's new OCP oil pipeline.  The foreigners,
from Colombia, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, Ireland, and the United States
are all facing imminent deportation.  Meanwhile, the Ecuadorians are facing
charges of halting pipeline construction, trespass, and damaging
construction equipment.  In response to the charges, local environmental and
human rights groups point out that OCP's environmental license was revoked
by the country's Environmental Ministry due to damage done to local
ecosystems BY THE OCP ITSELF.  Until the license is reinstated, the oil
consortium is prohibited from working in the Mindo region.  The peaceful
forest occupation was also taking place on private property within the Mindo
Nambillo Protected Reserve with permission from the landowner.
Additionally, evidence continues to surface of irregularities in both the
eviction and subsequent arrest of the activists which clearly violated the
Ecuadorian constitution and penal code law, as well as international human
rights law.  Principally, the eviction and arrests were carried out BEFORE a
warrant or eviction order were given.  Local groups report that government
officials failed to produce these critical documents even after the
activists had been transferred to a detention center in Quito, 2 hours from
Mindo.

Accion Ecologica has filed a Habeas Corpus brief before the Municipality of
Quito which would free the activists and drop all charges.  The hearing is
set for Monday morning and they are urging concerned citizens around the
world to write letters of solidarity and demand that the government drop all
charges and release the activists immediately.

#2 PLEASE TAKE A MINUTE TO LET THE ECUADORIAN GOVERNMENT KNOW THAT THE EYES
OF
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ARE UPON THEM!  WE WILL NOT STAND FOR THE
WRONGFUL AND ILLEGAL ARREST OF THOSE WHOSE ONLY CRIME WAS TO DEFEND LIFE!

EMAIL LETTERS to Accion Ecologica at: amazonia@accionecologica.org and
oilwatch@uio.satnet.net (yes, these emails actually work!) who will deliver
them at the hearing Monday morning.

Please address your letters to:
General (r)
Paco Moncayo
Alcalde del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito
Quito - Ecuador

Señor
Efrén Cocíos
Vice-Alcalde del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________
#3 Acción Por la Vida Mindo ¨ Acción Ecológica ¨ Amazon Watch ¨ Rainforest
Action Network
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 28 2002
Contacts: In Ecuador - Natalia Arias, Acción Ecológica (593-22-547-516)
          Molly Brown, Acción por la vida(593-22-765-471)
In US -        Kevin Koenig, Amazon Watch (510-419-0617) or cell
(202-256-9795)
Ilyse Hogue, Rainforest Action Network (415-398-4404)

PIPELINE PROTESTS CONTINUE AS ECUADORIAN ARMED FORCES
EVICT MINDO ENVIRONMENTALISTS

Local Community Blocks Highway and Confiscates OCP Vehicles in Response

(Mindo, Ecuador)-Approximately one hundred members of the Ecuadorian
National Police forcibly evicted seventeen activists Monday evening
blockading the OCP pipeline route through the sensitive Mindo Nambillo
Protected Cloudforest.  Residents of Mindo, with support from international
allies, had been peacefully occupying the treetops and cloudforest ridgeline
of this protected forest since January 2 in an effort to stop the
construction of the heavy crude pipeline through the area.

The Mindo Nambillo Cloudforest Reserve and the surrounding ecologically
sensitive forests are considered an unparalleled epicenter of biodiversity
and are home to more than 450 species of birds---46 of which are threatened
by extinction.

Local Ecuadorian and foreign activists were arrested at the site and
transported in buses contracted by the OCP Consortium to a detention center
in capital city of Quito.  They are expected to be charged at a hearing set
for Tuesday and Wednesday afternoon.

In response to the arrests, sixty men and women demonstrated their
opposition to the pipeline's passage by blocking the principal highway from
Quito to Los Bancos through the night.  During this time, local citizens
confiscated two large OCP tractor-trailers carrying pipeline tubes destined
for Quito.  Residents forced the vehicles into the town square where, in a
display of colorful defiance, they painted tubes with the phrase "OCP out of
Mindo."  Townspeople are demanding that all seventeen detainees be released
before they relinquish the vehicles.

"We demand the immediate release of those detained whose only crime is
defending the Ecuadorian patrimony and humanity. We also reaffirm our
struggle against the construction of the OCP pipeline and declare that these
types of repressive measures will not stop us," said Efrain Toapanta of
Acción por la Vida.

The eviction is the latest controversy to plague the embattled pipeline.  On
March 6, Ecuador's Ministry of the Environment revoked OCP's environmental
license for the Mindo region until damage endured during construction has
been repaired.  The license suspension came just hours after the government
reached an agreement with Amazonian communities who paralyzed commerce and
brought oil production to a stand still over OCP construction and
socio-economic conditions in the impoverished region. Three protesters were
killed in a military crackdown during the week-long state of emergency.

"Yet again we see OCP relying on the Ecuadorian military to do its dirty
work.  The Consortium is evidently willing to clear anything in its path-be
it endangered species, old growth cloudforest, or peaceful protestors," said
Kevin Koenig, Oil Campaigner with Amazon Watch.  "With this latest activity,
OCP has shown their blatant indifference to sensitive ecosystems, the
livelihoods of local communities, and basic human rights," said Koenig.

The forest occupation in Mindo has drawn international attention and
support, including letters of solidarity from Julia Butterfly Hill.
Financial giants WestLB and Citibank, who have been hit with protests in 24
countries around the world, continue to come under fire for their
involvement in the $1.1 billion project.


from EarthNet News March 29, 2002

EarthNet News
... a project of the Center for Environmental Citizenship
http://www.envirocitizen.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------
March 29, 2002  
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This week in EarthNet, we take a look at how the US
furniture business is treating ancient forests. And
there's a new section, AT THE (GRASS)ROOT, that looks
at the good work of good groups. This week we're highlighting
some Buffalo Soldiers.

Plus, we've got some good news -- you can breathe a
little easier this week after a court ruling. But the
bad news is that nagging suspicion that the Bush administration
is in the pocket of Big Oil turns out to be true. Check
it out in GLIMMER OF HOPE and MERCY, MERCY ME.

--Zachariah Silk, EarthNet Editor  
mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Corporate Corner: Knock on Wood
2. Quote of the Week
3. At the (Grass)Root: Buffalo Soldiers
4. Glimmer of Hope: Take a Deep Breath
5. Mercy, Mercy Me: Quid Pro Dough?  
6. Jobs and Internships
7. Conferences and Gatherings
8. Activist Phone Book & EarthNet News Info  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATE CORNER
----------------------------------------------------------------------

KNOCK ON WOOD

CLICK HERE to tell Ethan Allen to leave ancient forests
alone.
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/g7qAAaF1jPFp/ETHANALLEN

The US has already destroyed over 90 percent of its
ancient forests, and now it's the world's largest consumer
of ancient forest products. Some companies -- such
as Ikea, The Home Depot and Lowes -- have promised
not to buy and sell products from endangered forests.
Others have refused to take such a strong stand. And
new evidence shows that US furniture manufacturers
are the single largest illegal-timber consuming industry
in the country. They buy illegally harvested timber
from Amazon and African forests and contribute to the
destruction of ecosystems and indigenous communities.

Student activists all over the country are calling
attention to evidence -- presented in a Greenpeace
report -- that furniture manufacturers are buying illegally
cut wood. Despite the shouting, many companies prefer
to turn a deaf ear to the evidence of their harm. And
Ethan Allen, one of the largest furniture manufacturers
in the US, has been the deafest of all.

Ethan Allen is an independent company and retails their
own furniture in more than 300 outlets across the US,
which makes them one of the largest furniture retailers
in the country. Though they've seen clear evidence
they are buying illegal wood, the company refuses to
assess their wood purchases or commit to a total phase
out of wood from endangered forests.

Greenpeace, SEAC, Free the Planet! and other environmental
groups are launching a campaign to highlight the questionable
practices of Ethan Allen and others in the furniture
industry. The groups are calling on Ethan Allen to
stop buying timber that is illegally logged from endangered
forests and to commit to selling timber that is certified
by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). They're going
to radically change the US furniture industry once
and for all. Want to help?

TAKE ACTION NOW:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/g7qAAaF1jPFp/ETHANALLEN
Help radically change the US furniture industry.

TAKE MORE ACTION:
Join in the fun! Greenpeace is organizing Days of Action
across the county on April 14-16. For more info call
Greenpeace's Meghan Conklin at 1-888-363-9197 or go
to http://actionnetwork.org/ct/W7qAAaF1jP-1/GREENPEACE-INFO
.

FOR MORE INFO:
**Greenpeace Report (requires Adobe Acrobat)
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/6dqAAaF1jPFG/GREENPEACE_REPORT
**Greenpeace Forest Info
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/61qAAaF1jPFH/GREENPEACE

----------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE OF THE WEEK  
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Aim for the chopping block. If you aim for the wood,
you will have nothing. Aim past the wood, aim through
the wood; aim for the chopping block.

-- Annie Dillard

----------------------------------------------------------------------
AT THE (GRASS)ROOT
----------------------------------------------------------------------

BUFFALO SOLDIERS

Fifty million buffalo once roamed the plains of North
America. They were tuned into the seasons and moved
about at will -- no artificial boundaries blocking
them in. Think about it -- this was the largest concentration
of mammals ever known to exist anywhere at anytime.
We all know that by the early 20th century all but
a fraction of the herds had been slaughtered. Their
direct descendants -- the only continuously wild population
in America -- are alive today in and around Yellowstone
National Park. However, the survival of these last
wild buffalo is in jeopardy. The State of Montana and
public agencies are running a program that is eerily
reminiscent of the old buffalo slaughters. Under this
program, any innocent bison who wander out of a human
drawn line in the snow are chased by snowmobiles, helicopters
and ATVs -- and then trapped, confined in pens and
shot dead.  

Enter the Buffalo Field Campaign (BFC) -- a community
of volunteers who defend America's last free roaming
bison and share their story with the world. The wily
activists stand side-by-side with the buffalo on their
native range and advocate for their protection -- putting
themselves between the bison and the bullet. These
Buffalo Soldiers are armed with some impressive tools
including public process, education, videography, and
litigation. But their most impressive work comes from
their legions of volunteers who travel from all over
the world to stand on the snow covered plains of the
Yellowstone Park and protect these majestic creatures.

FOR MORE INFO:
**Buffalo Field Campaign
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/WdqAAaF1jPFC/BUFFALO
**Salon 03-28-02
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/O7qAAaF1jPFK/SALON

TAKE ACTION NOW:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/W1qAAaF1jPFV/BUFFALO_ACTION
Tell the US Government to protect Yellowstone's buffalo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
GLIMMER OF HOPE
----------------------------------------------------------------------

TAKE A DEEP BREATH

The Environmental Protection Agency says it can finally
move on requiring tougher air pollution standards after
winning a five-year legal fight over one of the most
controversial Clinton-era environmental regulations.
The U.S. Court of Appeals yesterday upheld the standards
for ozone and particulate pollution putting a steak
in the heart of a five-year campaign by industry groups
to have the standards overturned. The court brushed
aside industry arguments and ruled that the U.S. EPA
did not exceed its authority in setting the standards
and that the standards were neither arbitrary nor unreasonable.
According to some solid estimates the standards will
prevent 15,000 premature deaths, 350,000 cases of asthma,
and 1 million cases of decreased lung function in children.
EPA Administrator Christie Whitman responded to the
ruling with some groundbreaking insights, "what this
says is first of all the court recognizes sound science
and the ability of the EPA to enforce that and in fact
particulate matter and smog are important to public
health." Thanks, Christie, it's a relief to know the
EPA Administrator thinks that the agency should enforce
good science and that pollution is bad for us.

FOR MORE INFO:
**NRDC News 03-27-02
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/O1qAAaF1jPFJ/NRDC_NEWS
**Los Angeles Times 03-27-02
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/6pqAAaF1jPF-/LATIMES

TAKE ACTION NOW:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/gdqAAaF1jPF0/CLEAN_AIR
Tell the Bush Administration You Want Clean Air

----------------------------------------------------------------------
MERCY, MERCY ME
----------------------------------------------------------------------

QUID PRO DOUGH?

The thousands of Department of Energy documents released
under court order confirm the cozy relationship between
huge, politically connected corporations and the White
House energy task force. It's clear U.S. Energy Secretary
Spencer Abraham met only with energy industry executives
and no environmental or consumer groups as he helped
to write the Bush administration's energy policy. Sure,
the Bush administration's love affair with big business
isn't much news. But now for the first time we're getting
a look at how this exclusive access works.  

Secretary Abraham met with 109 industry representatives
during the drafting of the energy policy. And the kicker
is a set of the individuals or groups that met with
Abraham contributed a total of $16.6 million to the
Republicans since 1999 -- nearly three times what they
gave to the Democrats. So, what does all this dough
get you?

Policy, baby, policy. The Energy Department's documents
show that an executive order on energy policy released
by President Bush last May was copied nearly word-for-word
from a proposal by Big Oil lobbyists. On March 20,
our friends at the American Petroleum Institute (API)
sent an email to the administration containing "a suggested
executive order." And, sure enough, on May 19 Bush
issued an executive order almost identical to API's
"suggestion." Starting to see the connection?

FOR MORE INFO:
**NY Times 03-27-02
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/OdqAAaF1jPFD/NYTIMES
**Washington Post 03-28-02
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/OpqAAaF1jPFZ/WAPOST

GRIST MAGAZINE EXCLUSIVE http://www.gristmagazine.com:
Confessions of an Energy Task Force member -- diary
of Dick Cheney's secretive group discovered!
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/67qAAaF1jPFF/GRIST_MAGAZINE

----------------------------------------------------------------------
JOBS AND INTERNSHIPS  
----------------------------------------------------------------------

These are a sampling of the over 200 environmental
and activist jobs and internships listed at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/index.asp

Job Title: Campaign Director
Organization: Save Our Wild Salmon
Location: Seattle, WA or Portland, OR
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/bpqAAaF1jPFT/3

Job Title: Seasonal Program Leader
Organization: Boys and Girls Harbor Environmental Center
Location: East Hampton, NY
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/b7qAAaF1jPFY/2

Job Title: Field Organizer
Organization: Green Corps.
Location: Boston, MA
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/bdqAAaF1jPFR/1

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFERENCES, GATHERINGS AND VIEWINGS  
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Lots more events listed at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/index.asp

WHAT: Factory Farming Forum and Rally
WHERE: Trenton, NJ
WHEN: 4/7/02 - 4/8/02
FOR MORE INFO:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/b1qAAaF1jPFQ/2

WHAT: Corporate Responsibility and Our Environment
WHERE: Denver, CO
WHEN: 4/10/02
FOR MORE INFO:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/gpqAAaF1jPFP/1

WHAT: Greenpeace Forest Days of Action
WHERE: All over the country
WHEN: 04/14/02 - 04/16/02
FOR MORE INFO:
www.greenpeaceusa.org/forests  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVIST PHONE BOOK  
----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Capitol Switchboard: 202.224.3121  
White House Comment Line: 202.456.1111  

White House Address: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington,
DC 20500  
Senate Address: US Senate, Washington, DC 20510  
House Address: US House of Representatives, Washington,
DC 20515  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Write your own short articles for submission to EarthNet.
We are particularly interested in articles about student
activism on your campus.

For general comments:
mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org

Submit Jobs/Internships/Volunteer listings at:
http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/add.asp  

Submit Events at:
http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/add.asp

--------------------------------------------------

Visit the web address below and tell your friends about
this kick@$$ issue!

http://actionnetwork.org/join-forward.html?domain=san&r=e1qAAaF1juFz

If you received this message from a friend, you can
sign up for Student Action Network at:

http://actionnetwork.org/san/join.html?r=e1qAAaF1juFzE


from Greenpeace March 29, 2002

March 25-31, 2002

As long as the sun keeps shining the “Positive Energy” keeps flowing.  Time for Greenpeace’s CLEAN ENERGY NOW! Campaign weekly update.

+++ GREENEST SCHOOL . . .  IN SCOTLAND! +++

Lunnasting Primary in Scotland was named as the winner of the WWF Our World Schools Challenger.

After winning this environmental care contest, Lunnasting
Primary in Shetland, Scotland, will become the greenest
school in Scotland.  With solar panels already in place,
the prize from the contest will provide funding to install
a wind generator enabling the school to produce 90% of its
electricity needs through sustainable energy.  The wind
turbine and solar panels will be connected to the local
grid, enabling the school to sell electricity to the
generating company outside school hours.  Linda Cracknell,
WWF education officer stated, "winning ideas like wind
generator at Lunnasting Primary show us how schools can
play an essential part in shaping a better world through a
fresh approach to education . . . pupils at Lunnasting are
learning about their roles as citizens. . . " If they can
do it in Scotland imagine what we can do here!!?

You can learn more about WWF’s education for sustainable
development at: http://www.wwflearning.co.uk/welcome

+++ SEC FORCE