|
UCS NEWS - a monthly guide to news you can use
from the
Union of
Concerned Scientists' website
http://www.ucsusa.org
Friday, June 8, 2001
1. Coal vs. wind power ...
you be the judge!
2. New report on nuclear arms ...
Toward True Security
3. Coming Soon!
New report on
automobile fuel efficiency ...
Drilling in Detroit
4. Have you had an experience with
antibiotic resistance?
Tell us your story.
5. Subscription
info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. COAL VS. WIND POWER ...
YOU BE THE JUDGE!
See for yourself how wind power
blows away the burning of fossil
coal.
http://www.ucsusa.org/energy/?c01.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. NEW REPORT ON NUCLEAR ARMS
... TOWARD TRUE
SECURITY
"A US Nuclear Posture for the Next Decade" ...
Our new
report presents a rational response
to nuclear threat in a changing world.
http://www.ucsusa.org/security/?npr.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. COMING SOON ... NEW REPORT ON AUTOMOBILE
FUEL EFFICIENCY ... DRILLING IN
DETROIT
"Tapping Automaker Ingenuity to
Build Safe and Efficient
Automobiles"
This new UCS report challenges Detroit to bring advanced
technologies to bear and build a new type of automobile
for the new
century.
Stay tuned to http://www.ucsusa.org for the
report's release!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. HAVE YOU HAD AN EXPERIENCE WITH
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE?
... TELL US YOUR STORY!
The recent UCS
report Hogging It: Estimates of
Antimicrobial Abuse in Livestock warned that
70% of all antibiotics produced are fed to livestock
to promote
growth. As a result of the overuse of
antibiotics, the incidence
of diseases resistant to
treatment by them is alarmingly on the rise. Have
you or your family been affected?
Tell us about it. Help UCS in its
campaign to preserve
the effectiveness of antibiotics.
http://www.ucsusa.org/food/?ltr.victims.html
Send a FREE fax NOW and help make a difference!
As a result of fishing and
other human-related impacts, dozens of species of fish and wildlife in Alaska's
seas and coastal areas are depleted or in serious decline and failing to
recover. Some are nearing extinction. For example:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) is preparing an extensive Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) as its first attempt to assess the impact of large-scale
fishing on Alaska's environment. But NMFS is avoiding the hard questions about
the overall effect of removing over three billion pounds of fish from Alaskan
waters every year.
While wildlife populations
collapse throughout much of Alaska's maritime environment, NMFS continues to
tolerate fishery management practices that fail to protect all species in
Alaska's water, not just the animals that are the target of the fisheries.
Unless changed, this process sets a disturbing national precedent for the rest
of the United States, as NMFS is expected to replicate this effort around our
nation's coasts. Please tell NMFS that it should protect Alaska's amazing wildlife for future
generations by adopting a fisheries management plan that ensures the
conservation of the state's marine ecosystem and all of the marine wildlife that
rely on it.
Dear Friend of Global
Response,
You know the importance of turning sentiment into action, and
action into coordinated, effective campaigns. A number of recent
victories
in Global Response campaigns show that there is a global community
of
concerned individuals and that your participation does make a difference.
As you know, Global Response has a high impact with very low overhead,
but
it does take money and staff time to research and develop our action
alerts.
Unfortunatly we are facing a budget shortfall for this fiscal year
(which
ends in Aug). If you’d like to help us win MORE victories in
collaboration
with communities around the world, please give a generous
contribution
today. Your donation will enable us to help more of
the many communities
that ask us to organize international letter-writing
campaigns on their
behalf. When the victories come, you’ll know
your letters and your
financial support helped bring them about.
Today we’re also inviting you to help us launch our new Youth
Environmental
Action Program by designating your donation for that purpose.
As you know,
children’s letters can be especially effective in reaching
decision makers
as human beings. Many of you have told us how much you
appreciate our
youth-oriented materials. Soon you will be able to enjoy a
new, interactive
youth web page where kids from around the world can post
their letters,
drawings, and stories. You'll be able to access it from our
home page at
www.globalresponse.org within a few weeks.
Thank you
for the many ways you put your sentiments into action -- and for
making
Global Response one of them!
Sincerely,
Mariella Colvin
Assistant Director
P.S. Attached is a letter from a teacher who uses
our youth materials, and
excerpts from children’s letters -- I
think you’ll enjoy them.
TO MAKE A DONATION
The easiest way, if
you reside in the US, is to just send us a check or
money order directly to
our office at P.O. Box 7490, Boulder, CO 80306.
Please let us know if you
would like to designate it specifically for our
youth program.
Another way is to use a Visa or Master credit card, providing the
following information:
Your Name
Address
Credit Card (Visa
or Mastercard) Number
Expiration Date
Please send this credit card
information directly to our office:
FAX: + 303-449-9794
MAIL:
Global Response
PO Box 7490
Boulder,
CO 80306
USA
All contributions are tax deductible.
For
NON-US RESIDENTS:
All donations must be in US FUNDS!
The best way to
donate is to fax us your credit card information.
Another option is to
send a bank money order in US dollars, which is less
expensive
than
wiring the money directly.
Thank you in advance for your generous and
needed support for Global
Response. We look forward to hearing from you
soon!
Towards A Sustainable Future,
Mariella Colvin
Assistant Director
======================================
LCV
WEEKLY ENVIRONMENTAL UPDATE
June 11, 2001
======================================
The League of Conservation
Voters (LCV) continues to monitor congressional
and administration activity
and highlight lawmakers for their actions on
important environmental issues.
For a concise look at current events on
Capitol Hill and beyond click below.
=====================================
Congress Watch
=====================================
· The House Interior
appropriations subcommittee restored $800 million to
important land
conservation and energy efficiency programs originally cut
in President
Bush’s budget request. Full committee mark-ups are scheduled
this week for
Agriculture and Interior.
· Plus, see this week’s schedule of events and
learn more about what
members of Congress are doing on the environment.
· Get the details at Congress Watch:
http://www.lcv.org/actioncenter/weekly_update/6_12_01.html
· Special Announcement: Bill Moyers and the World Resources
Institute have
teamed up for a television special that explores one of the
most important
questions of the new century: What is happening to Earth’s
capacity to
support nature and civilization? Come on a journey to meet
people who
understand how their lives depend on Earth’s ecosystems and how
their own
energy and dedication might help restore them. Tune in to PBS,
June 19 at
8pm. Check your local PBS listing or check their website
http://www.pbs.org/ for schedules.
====================================================================
The LCV Environmental Update is brought to you by the League of
Conservation Voters, the nonprofit political voice of the environmental
community. LCV is the only national organization dedicated full-time to
informing the public about the environmental records of federally elected
officials and candidates.
Committee hearing schedules and floor
votes in this update are retrieved
from “Greensheets” at www.greensheets.com
and “Environment and Energy
Daily” at www.eenews.net.
LCV publishes
annually the National Environmental Scorecard, which rates
members of
Congress on the most critical environmental votes cast during
that year.
WHAT YOU CAN DO!
*Add your voice to the tens of thousands of
citizens across the country
already holding elected officials accountable
for their votes on the
environment and helping to elect a pro-environment
Congress! Join LCV in
its fight to prevent the hard-won progress of the last
30 years from being
dismantled. Click
https://secure3.nmpinc.com/lcvlink/forms/join_new.htm
*Check out our
website at www.lcv.org!
*If this update has been forwarded to you and
you would like to receive
your own updates, send the following command via
email to:
lyris@client-mail.com subscribe lcv-update
*Any
questions or comments about lcv-update can be sent to lcv@lcv.org
*If
you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list, send the
following
command via email to: lyris@client-mail.com unsubscribe
lcv-update
League of Conservation Voters
1920 L Street, NW Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
202-785-8683 Fax: 202-835-0491
Email:
lcv@lcv.org
Dear Members of Global Response's "Quick Response
Network:"
Environmental groups in Pakistan are on a roller-coaster ride:
first UP,
when we learned that Shell Oil Company decided to withdraw from an
oil/gas
exploration project in Kirthar National Park, then DOWN, when the
governor
of Sindh Province signed a second amendment to the Sindh Wildlife
Protection
Ordinance of 1972. The amendment, called the Sindh
Wildlife Protection
Ordinanace of 2001, allows mining in the national parks
of Sindh Province.
It is clearly intended to legalize the oil/gas
explorations that the
governor wants to push forward, with or without Shell.
To become law, the governor must sign the amendment again within 90
days. A
coalition of environmental organizations in Pakistan wants to
generate as
many letters as possible to the governor, to convince him to let
the
amendment lapse by not re-signing it.
Please send a
letter/fax/email to the governor, urging him to withdraw the
amendment and
to provide for complete protection of Kirthar National Park.
For background
information, see the December 2000 Global Response Action
Alert at: http://www.globalresponse.org/gra_index/gra0600.html
Here is a model letter, drafted by the Committee on Kirthar:
Mr.Mohammad Mian Soomro
Governor, Province of Sindh
Pakistan
ph:Int'l code + 92-21-9201201-6
fax: Int'l code + 92-21-9201218
email: governor@khi.paknet.com.pk
Dear Sir:
The
promulagation by your office of the Sindh Wildlife Protection (second
amendment) Ordinance 2001, which allows for oil/gas exploration activities
in the previously protected national parks of the Sindh Province is a
decision which is viewed with great concern and regret by conservationists
and nature lovers the world over. At a time when there is growing consensus
within the world's scientific and research community that protecting the
earth's bio-diversity is of critical importance to ensuring the sustainable
growth of our future generations, such policy decisions are out of tune with
the realities and demands of our time and will open the floodgates of
large-scale environmental degradation.
Instead, national leaders
need to be strengthening the already existing
conservation laws and
formulating even more laws and regulations which can
effectively protect and
conserve the threatened bio-diversity of our world.
I respectfully
request your office to reconsider your decision and restore
in earnest, the
true spirit of the Sindh Wildlife Protection Ordinance of
1972, so that it
can serve its true purpose.
********************************
Paula Palmer, Executive Director
Global Response
PO Box 7490
Boulder CO 80306
Tel. 303-444-0306
Fax. 303-449-9794
Website:
www.globalresponse.org
Mission: Global Response empowers
people of all ages, cultures, and
nationalities to protect the environment
by creating partnerships for
effective citizen action. At the
request of indigenous peoples and
grassroots organizations, Global Response
organizes internatinoal
letter-writing campaigns to help communities prevent
environmental
destruction. Global Response involves young people
as well as adults in
these campaigns, to develop in them the values and
skills for global citizen
cooperation and earth
stewardship.
You can take action on this
alert either via email
(please see directions below) or via the web at:
http://actionnetwork.org/take-action.tcl?key=419220A21929B0613121504C144
Visit the web address below and tell your friends to
take action on
this important campaign!
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/Protect_Emergency_Contraception/forward?rk=CdqUq8d1rda8W
We encourage you to take action by June 22, 2001
Senators
Threaten Access to Emergency Contraception!
----------------------
Sen. Jesse Helms (R-NC) and other anti-family planning
lawmakers are
leading an aggressive effort to restrict
teens' access to emergency
contraception. When the
Senate considers the Elementary and Secondary
Education
Act (S. 1) later TODAY, Sen. Helms is expected to offer
an
amendment to prohibit the use of federal funds for
emergency contraception
at school-based health centers,
without mandatory written parental
consent.
The Helms amendment could jeopardize the health of
teenagers who are looking to act responsibility after
engaging in
unprotected sex. Emergency contraceptives
(EC) are proven safe and effective
at preventing pregnancy
when taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex. If
widely
used, EC could reduce unintended pregnancies by 75
percent.
Please contact your two Senators TODAY to
express your opposition to the
Helms amendment.
If the Helms amendment passes it will undermine local
control of health care delivery and threaten the success
of teen
pregnancy prevention efforts. We know that
information about and access to
contraceptives are
critical to helping teenagers prevent pregnancy. Let
your Senators know you oppose this misguided amendment.
----------------------
INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:
If you have access to a web browser, you can take action
on this alert
by going to the following URL:
http://actionnetwork.org/take-action.tcl?key=419220A21929B0613121504C144
INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:
Just choose the "reply to sender"
option on your email
program, and edit the letter below as you wish. Do
not delete "-YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW-" and "-END
OF LETTER-".
Please do not add your name and address
to your letter. Our system
automatically does this
for you.
We STRONGLY encourage
you to make edits directly to
our sample letter below, and put the alert
talking
points into your own words. An individualized letter
is worth
ten computer generated letters. Of course,
hundreds of unedited letters will
still create a large
impact, so please reply even if you don't have time
to personalize the letter.
Your letter will be addressed and sent
to:
Senator Hillary Clinton
Senator Charles Schumer
-------YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW---------
I am writing
to urge you to oppose a proposed amendment
offered by Sen. Jesse Helms to
the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (S. 1) that would block access to
emergency
contraception in school-based health centers.
Access to emergency contraception is crucial to reducing
our
nation's staggering rates of teenage pregnancy
and abortion. Each year,
nearly one million teenagers
become pregnant. Nearly 80% of these
pregnancies are
unintended and half will end in abortion. The Helms
amendment would do very little to address these alarming
numbers. In
fact, the Helms language could result in
an increase in these
numbers.
Furthermore, the Helms amendment would not reduce
teenage
sexual activity. Instead, it could prevent teens who
have had
unprotected intercourse or who have experienced
a contraceptive failure from
acting responsibility
by seeking the services necessary to avoid unintended
pregnancy. Many of these teens would miss a crucial
opportunity to be
counseled by a health professional
about delaying sexual activity, the risks
of unprotected
intercourse and the importance of being tested for
sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV.
I hope that when the
Senate considers the Helms amendment
later TODAY you will keep these
thoughts in mind. I
urge you to vote NO on the Helms amendment.
I
look forward to hearing from you on this matter.
-------END OF
LETTER-------------------------
Natural Resources Defense
Council's
LEGISLATIVE WATCH
June 13, 2001
******************************
Please do not reply to this message.
See the instructions
below for how to unsubscribe or contact NRDC with
questions
or comments.
******************************
Contents:
1) Legislative Watch
2) About Our Bulletins/How to Subscribe &
Unsubscribe
3) About NRDC/How to Contact Us
The information in this
bulletin is also available on our
website at http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/legwatch.asp.
The
web version links to the text of bills and congressional web
pages.
To take action on these and other environmental
issues, visit NRDC's Earth
Action Center at
http://www.nrdc.org/action, where you can
use our online
activism tools or subscribe to Earth Action, our biweekly
activist bulletin.
1) LEGISLATIVE WATCH
This is a status
report on congressional action on the
environment. To make new or updated
sections easy to find,
we've highlighted them with:
= N O T E ! =
6/13/01
Work on appropriations bills is proceeding, with the
Interior and Agriculture funding bills set to move soon to
the House
floor. A significant new bill addressing global
warming was introduced by
Sen. Byrd (D-WV) and Sen. Stevens
(R-AK), both of whom have grown
increasingly concerned about
this problem. The Senate will also adopt a new
organizational structure to reflect the new Democratic
majority.
...
Budget/Appropriations
= N O T E ! =
On 6/14, the
House Appropriations Committee will consider
President Bush's request for $7
billion in supplemental
military funding for fiscal year 2001. This bill
also
contains $300 million in financial assistance for low-income
households struggling with high power bills this summer.
Democrats may
add amendments to try to lower energy prices
using price caps.
= N O
T E ! =
On 6/13, the House Appropriations Committee is expected to
approve the fiscal year 2002 funding bills for the
Agriculture and
Interior departments. The House version of
the Interior bill contains $800
million more than the
president's request for the agency, and drops the most
controversial provisions that would have jeopardized
enforcement of the
Endangered Species Act and provided
funding for a study on oil and gas
drilling in the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge. The bill provides increased
funding for the U.S. Geological Survey, which the Bush
administration
had targeted for severe cuts. Energy funding
is also boosted by almost $300
million. So far, the bill is
generally free of provisions that would weaken
current
environmental laws, although funding levels for federal land
acquisition are unreasonably low.
= N O T E ! =
The House
Agriculture bill does not contain funding for
important wetlands reserves,
wildlife habitat, and farmland
conservation programs. Environmentalists
would like to fully
fund these programs by adding $650 million.
= N
O T E ! =
On 6/13, a Senate subcommittee will hear from EPA
Administrator Whitman on next year's funding for the agency.
Whitman is
expected to answer questions on the EPA's two
most controversial proposals
-- a request to cut federal
enforcement funding significantly, resulting in
the loss of
well over 200 enforcement employees, and the lack of
adequate funding to update old sewage treatment and
stormwater systems.
The EPA is also requesting cuts in funds
to monitor air and beachwater
quality. The committee plans
to move the EPA bill to the House floor by the
end of July.
= N O T E ! =
On 6/12, the House Transportation
Appropriations
Subcommittee approved a transportation funding bill for next
year. The bill does not include language blocking the
federal government
from considering whether vehicle fuel
economy standards should be increased.
On 5/6, Congress passed the Bush administration's tax cut
bill, H.R.
1836. The bill authorizes a $1.35 trillion tax
cut over the next decade.
Opponents of the cut maintain that
the huge loss of government revenue will
make it impossible
to adequately fund many important environmental programs.
For a step-by-step guide to our annual odyssey through
resolutions,
reconciliations and appropriations, see NRDC's
budget process fact sheet
(http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/fbudg.asp).
...
Campaign Finance Reform
On 5/22, the Senate sent S.
27, Sen. McCain's (R-AZ) and
Sen. Feingold's (D-WI) campaign finance reform
bill, to the
House for consideration. This bill, approved by the Senate
on 4/2, would ban "soft money" donations from corporations
to political
parties, which currently are not subject to
federal limits. Huge soft money
contributions from wealthy
corporations have made it easier for these
corporations to
persuade members of Congress to attach anti-environment
riders to funding bills, and to gain special exemptions from
environmental laws and regulations. S. 27 also contains a
provision that
would increase the amount of money
individuals could give to candidates,
which has the
potential to increase the influence of the wealthiest
contributors. Another provision would limit issue advocacy
by nonprofit
groups preceding an election (this provision
may be unconstitutional,
however). While environmental
groups disagree on the merits of this
particular bill, they
generally support efforts to reduce the influence of
corporate special interests in the funding of national
elections.
...
Clean Air and Energy
= N O T E ! =
Sen. Bingaman
(D-NM), the new chair of the Senate Energy and
Natural Resources Committee,
will focus first on a
short-term energy bill to address energy supply and
prices
for this summer and winter. Sen. Bingaman and the Senate
Democratic leadership have been more supportive of energy
conservation
measures than their Republican counterparts,
and unlike the Republican
leadership, the Democrats oppose
drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic
National Wildlife
Refuge. However, environmentalists do not support the
Democratic energy bill (S. 597) introduced by Sen. Bingaman
on 3/22
because, in part, it would increase the use of coal
without environmental
safeguards and allow offshore oil and
gas leases in the eastern part of the
Gulf of Mexico.
= N O T E ! =
On 6/7, Rep. Matsui (D-CA) introduced
a comprehensive energy
tax bill (H.R. 2108) that provides tax incentives for
energy
conservation and production. While environmentalists support
incentives for energy efficiency technologies, this bill
contains
objectionable tax credits for coal production. This
bill is a companion to
the Senate bill, S. 596, offered by
Sen. Bingaman.
Sen. Reid (D-NV),
the highest-ranking Democratic member of
the Senate Environment and Public
Works Committee in the
Republican-controlled Senate, gave up his chance to
become
chair of the committee when the Democrats gained control so
that
Sen. Jeffords (I-VT) could have the position. In his
new role, Sen. Jeffords
will have the opportunity to move
the bipartisan bill that he and Sen.
Lieberman (D-CT)
authored to impose mandatory cuts on carbon pollution
through committee. The Jeffords-Lieberman bill, S. 556, has
14
cosponsors and new momentum. The House bill, H.R. 1256,
introduced by Rep.
Boehlert (R-NY) and Rep. Waxman (D-CA) on
3/27 has over 100 cosponsors.
On 5/17, the Bush administration announced its energy plan,
which
heavily emphasizes domestic development of oil, gas
and coal, and has new
incentives for nuclear power plants.
While the plan includes some energy
efficiency and renewable
energy proposals, these fall far short of what is
needed and
what environmentalists are advocating. The plan also would
weaken protections for air, water and wildlife. In addition,
the plan
proposes opening the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge and other wildlands to
oil and gas drilling.
On 5/16, Rep. Camp (R-MI) introduced H.R. 1864, a
bipartisan
bill aimed at making highly-fuel-efficient hybrid
gasoline-electric vehicles more affordable, and saving
consumers money
at the gas pump. On 4/24, a bipartisan group
of ten senators led by Sen.
Hatch (R-UT) and Sen.
Rockefeller (D-WV) introduced S. 760, a companion
Senate
bill with the same goals. The bills link the amount of tax
savings for each vehicle to increased fuel efficiency, and
would help
decrease both carbon dioxide emissions that
contribute to global warming and
the use of petroleum fuels.
On 5/10, Rep. Olver (D-MA) and Rep.
Gilchrest (R-MD)
introduced H.R. 1815, a House companion bill to S. 804.
Introduced by Senators Feinstein (D-CA), Snowe (R-ME),
Schumer (D-NY),
and Collins (R-ME) on 5/1, S. 804 seeks to
tighten corporate fuel economy
standards for sport utility
vehicles and light trucks. The bill would
require that SUVs
and other light trucks increase fuel economy to 27.5 mpg
by
model year 2007, expand the current fuel economy standards
to trucks
weighing between 8,500-10,000 pounds by 2007, and
raise the fuel economy of
the federal government's fleet by
6 mpg. SUVs and light trucks currently use
43 percent more
gasoline per mile than the average car.
Because the
Energy and Commerce Committee was unable to
reach consensus on Rep. Barton's
(R-TX) bill to address the
California power shortage (H.R. 1647), the bill
has not yet
made it to the House floor. Introduced on 5/1, the bill
purports to address the electricity shortages in California,
but would
do little for California, and would drastically
undermine federal
environmental protections. The bill would
give governors the power to allow
utilities to bypass
federal environmental protections contained in the Clean
Air
Act and Endangered Species Act under poorly defined "energy
emergencies." Under such circumstances, the bill also would
exempt
utilities from regulations that limit smog and soot
pollution. In addition,
the bill would allow states to let
hydroelectric plants ignore federal
requirements that
protect endangered species such as salmon and that ensure
that water is available for fish and wildlife or ecosystem
restoration.
NRDC's report, A Responsible Energy Policy for the 21st
Century (http://www.nrdc.org/air/energy/rep/repinx.asp),
outlines the components of an alternative energy policy --
one that can
meet the nation's energy needs without
destroying wilderness or rolling back
environmental
safeguards.
...
Coastal and Marine Resources
= N O T E ! =
On 6/16, the House Fisheries Subcommittee, chaired by
Rep.
Gilchrest (R-MD), will hold the third in a series of
fisheries
management oversight hearings. The subcommittee is
considering the
reauthorization of the Magnuson/Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, the primary law
that dictates fisheries management in the United
States. On
6/7, the subcommittee held a hearing on seven other
fisheries
conservation laws.
...
Endangered Species
= N O T E ! =
On 6/7, the House Interior Subcommittee approved a funding
bill for the
Interior department. The bill did not include a
legislative rider, requested
by the Bush administration,
that would have blocked citizen access to the
courts to
enforce key provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
On
5/9, the Senate Fisheries, Wildlife and Water
Subcommittee considered
funding for the Endangered Species
Act. Witnesses generally agreed that this
program needs a
minimum funding level of $120 million to adequately protect
endangered or threatened species and their habitats.
...
Global Warming
= N O T E ! =
On 6/8, Sen. Byrd (D-WV) and
Sen. Stevens (R-AK) introduced
the bipartisan Climate Change Strategy and
Technology
Innovation Act of 2001 (S. 1008). This bill creates a
framework for the United States to develop a comprehensive
program to
reduce pollution that contributes to global
warming. The bill would require
the federal government to
develop a robust strategy to stabilize
concentrations of
greenhouse gases (those that exacerbate global warming) in
the atmosphere at levels required to protect human health
and the
environment.
On 5/16, the House approved a bill to reauthorize the State
Department. The bill contains language, added by Rep.
Menendez (D-NJ),
which urges the U.S. to reduce greenhouse
gases and continue to participate
in international
negotiations on the Kyoto Protocol treaty.
...
Public Health
= N O T E ! =
On 5/22, the House unanimously
approved H.R. 1831, a
bipartisan bill that exempts municipal solid waste and
small
quantities of hazardous waste from Superfund liability. This
bipartisan compromise legislation moved swiftly through the
House
because it had the support of key leaders on both the
Commerce Committee and
the Transportation Committee.
= N O T E ! =
On 5/3, Sen. Chafee
(R-RI) introduced a bill (S. 830) that
would fund research into links
between breast cancer and the
environment. Rep. Lowey (D-NY) introduced a
House companion
bill (H.R. 1723) on the same day.
On 4/26, Sen.
Boxer (D-CA) led six other Democratic senators
in offering S. 796, a bill
designed to inform the public
about the health dangers associated with
arsenic in drinking
water. The bill also seeks to inform people that the EPA
has
decided not to strengthen the arsenic standards because of
cost
concerns.
On 4/25, by a vote of 99-0, the Senate approved a popular
bipartisan brownfields redevelopment bill (S. 350),
introduced by
Senators Smith (R-NH), Chafee (R-RI), Reid
(D-NV), and Boxer (D-CA). The
bill provides states with
increased funding and authority to clean up former
industrial sites known as brownfields. The bill now moves to
the House,
where its fate is uncertain. The Bush
administration has signaled its
support for the bill, but
with funding extremely tight, finding money in the
budget
for brownfields clean-up may be difficult.
On 4/4, Rep.
Waxman (D-CA) introduced H.R. 1413, which would
reinstate the
arsenic-in-drinking-water standard of 10 parts
per billion (ppb) issued by
the Clinton administration in
January and revoked by the Bush administration
in late
March. This bill would also provide funding for local water
authorities to bring their systems into compliance. With 173
cosponsors
and the support of environmental and public
health groups, the bill's
supporters are pushing hard to
quickly bring it to the floor of the House.
In a move also
applauded by environmentalists, Rep. Sanders (I-VT) has
introduced H.R. 1252, a bill that would establish an
arsenic-in-drinking-water standard even lower than the 10
ppb standard
in H.R. 1413.
...
Public Lands
= N O T E ! =
On 6/7,
Rep. Simpson (R-ID) introduced the National Monument
Fairness Act of 2001
(H.R. 2114), a bill seeking to curb the
president's ability to either
designate new national
monuments or expand existing national monuments under
the
1906 Antiquities Act. This bill, which would require
congressional
approval for monuments over 50,000 acres in
size, is opposed by the
environmental community because it
would hinder swift presidential action to
protect important
public resources that are threatened by development.
On 5/23, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee
approved,
by voice vote, J. Steven Griles, President Bush's
nominee to be second in
command at the Department of the
Interior. Griles served in President
Reagan's Interior
Department for eight years. He is a lobbyist and a former
industry official who is expected to push for more industry
resource
extraction from, and less environmental protection
for, public lands.
Environmentalists oppose his nomination.
On 5/1, the House unanimously
passed a substantially
improved version of H.R. 601, a bill that
redesignates a
portion of the Craters of the Moon National Monument in
Idaho as a preserve where traditional hunting would be
allowed.
Environmentalists did not oppose the final version
of this bill, because it
reflects an agreement that the
Clinton administration had reached with the
local community,
and it ensures that the Interior Department retain
oversight
of hunting there.
...
Regulatory Reform
On
5/23, the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee approved,
by a 9-3 vote, the
nomination of John Graham for a key
position within the White House that
makes recommendations
on regulations to be issued. Sen. Lieberman (D-CT)
joined
Sen. Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Torricelli (D-NJ) to oppose
Graham.
Environmental, labor, and consumer groups oppose
Graham's nomination because
he consistently advocates an
ideological approach to regulation that is
hostile to strong
environmental, health, and safety protections.
...
For information on the environmental voting records of
members of
Congress, see the League of Conservation Voter's
National Environmental
Scorecards at
http://www.lcv.org/scorecards/index.htm
...........
2) About Our Bulletins/How to Subscribe &
Unsubscribe
NRDC distributes three bulletins by email. To subscribe to
any or all of them or to join our activist networks, go to
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/subscribe.asp.
If you already
subscribe and want to change your subscriptions or update
your email address or other information, go to
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/profileeditor
(or see the
unsubscribe information below).
EARTH ACTION is sent
biweekly and calls out urgent
environmental issues requiring immediate
action. To
unsubscribe from Earth Action, send an email message to
earthaction@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the subject line.
LEGISLATIVE WATCH is sent biweekly when Congress is in
session and
tracks environmental bills moving through the
federal legislature. To
unsubscribe from Legislative Watch,
send an email message to
legwatch@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE
in the subject line.
The
CALIFORNIA ACTIVIST NETWORK ACTION ALERT is distributed
monthly to members
of NRDC's California Activist Network and
provides action tools to
Californians and others concerned
with protecting the state's natural
resources and the health
of its citizens. To unsubscribe, send an email
message to
wildcalifornia@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the subject
line.
...........
3) About NRDC/How to Contact Us
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a nonprofit
environmental
organization with over 500,000 members
nationwide and a staff of scientists,
attorneys and
environmental experts. Our mission is to protect the
planet's wildlife and wild places and ensure a safe and
healthy
environment for all living things.
For more information about NRDC or
how to become a member of
NRDC, please contact us at:
Natural
Resources Defense Council
40 West 20th Street
NY, NY 10011
212-727-4511 (voice) / 212-727-1773 (fax)
General information:
nrdcinfo@nrdc.org
Email subscription questions: nrdcaction@nrdc.org
http://www.nrdc.org
Also visit:
BioGems -- Saving Endangered Wild Places
A project of the Natural
Resources Defense Council
http://www.savebiogems.org