|
Greetings from the
Monday. s article in the Anchorage
Daily News editorial section is right up our alley on the issue of balance on
the Alaska Board of Game. It is essential that wildlife viewing interests
be represented on the Board. We
were very pleased with the Daily News. treatment of the issue and would very
much welcome your individual letters to the editor supporting their position,
should any of you feel so inspired.
Letters may not exceed 225 words . so
shorter is better! They must be signed and include the writer. s address and
day phone number. The addresses for
letters (in order of preference for quick submission) are as
follows:
e-mail: letters@adn.com
website: www.adn.com/letters/ (click on the link at the top of the
page)
fax: 907-258-2157
mail: Letters, Anchorage Daily News,
Paul
e-mail: streed@juneauempire.com
fax: 907-586-3028
mail: Editor, Juneau Empire,
e-mail: letters@newsminer.com
website: www.newsminer.com (click
on . write letter to the editor. link)
Opinion (Editorial board)
(Published:
Game Board balance
Knowles' slate is strong, but its tenure may be
short
For Gov. Tony Knowles' two terms, the Legislature has played
Whack-a-Mole with his choices for the Board of Game.
Whenever the governor picks someone who thinks about more
than just hunting or trapping or who won't automatically approve killing wolves
in the name of "predator control," WHACK! The Legislature ditches the nominee.
Gov. Knowles then picks a similarly minded replacement. That
lucky person gets to serve until the Legislature convenes again and can send him
or her packing.
As the Legislature plays Whack-a-Mole, Gov. Knowles responds
like the Energizer Bunny. He keeps going and going, trying to bring some balance
to the Game Board with his appointments, even if they are doomed to be
short-timers.
His latest set of choices for the Game Board reflects that
admirable persistence. The five include three men, wildlife filmmaker Joel
Bennett and retired biologists Vic Van Ballenberghe and Jack Lentfer, who previously served on the board. During
their tenure, the three were thoughtful and judicious and open to the concerns
of nonhunters. All three served at
a time when the Legislature did not treat those traits as fatal flaws. Mr. Van
Ballenberghe came back for another
tour of duty during the Knowles administration, but pro-hunting ideologues in
the Legislature cut short his tenure by refusing to confirm him.
Neither the governor nor his appointees are even remotely
anti-hunting. Messrs. Bennett, Lentfer and Van Ballenberghe have decades of experience hunting in
To represent Native subsistence interests, Gov. Knowles' list
includes Tim Towarak, a Native
leader from Unalakleet. The fifth
appointee, Rob Hardy, is a big-game guide and trapper from Wasilla.
Taken as a whole, the
five nominees are an excellent slate. By law, the latest Game Board choices can
serve at least until Gov. Knowles leaves office in December. They deserve the
chance to serve full three-year terms.
-- Matt Zencey
ph. (907) 277-0897
fax (907) 277-7423
To: All Activists
From: Steve Holmer, American Lands Alliance,
202/547-9105,
wafcdc@americanlands.org
Date: August 1, 2002
Senate Fire Logging Rider & House Legislation Introduced
The Senate is not likely to
consider the Interior Appropriations bill
this week
before the month-long summer recess, but it will be one of the
first orders of business when they return in
September. When the
Interior bill does come
before the Senate, we expect to see a rider
offered by
Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) and others that seeks to suspend
environmental laws, ban citizen involvement and prohibit
judicial review
for logging projects on the National
Forests under the guise of fire
prevention.
We have not seen language of Sen.
Craig's fire rider so it remains
unclear how far the
exemptions from law will go and what parts of the
landscape would be at risk. But if several new
House bills are any
indication, this could be the worst
logging rider ever.
Calls are
urgently needed to alert your members of Congress to this
threat. The summer recess also offers activists
an important
opportunity to meet with their elected
officials and discuss their
concerns.
House Bills Introduced to Suspend
All Laws for Logging
Last week, a fire logging bill, the
National Forest Fire Prevention Act,
H.R. 5214, was
introduced in the House by Rep. Dennis Rehberg (R-MT)
that proposes to permanently suspend all laws for logging
and bans
citizen appeals and judicial
review. This language is much broader than
the infamous Salvage Logging Rider of 1995.
The bill's "not withstanding any
other law provision" suspends the
National Environmental
Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act,
the
Endangered Species Act, the Wilderness Act of 1964 and all other
laws. The bill applies to all "existing timber
sale analysis areas."
Depending on how far back that
term applies, this bill could overturn
forty years of
conservation progress by allowing currently protected old
growth, roadless areas and Wilderness Areas on the National
Forests to
be roaded and clearcut with no option of
appeal.
H.R. 5214 now has 24
cosponsors including Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA),
chairman
of the Forestry Subcommittee of the Agriculture Committee.
Other Cosponsors who should by publicly criticized for
supporting this
outrageous anti-environmental bill
include Reps. John Peterson (R-PA),
Don Young (R-AK),
Wally Herger (R-CA), Mike Simpson (R-ID), Butch Otter
(R-ID), Chris Cannon (R-UT), Walter Jones (R-NC), John
Doolittle (R-CA),
John Duncan (R-TN), Jim Gibbons
(R-NV), George Radanovich (R-CA), Tom
Tancredo (R-CO),
Billy Tauzin (R-LA), Gil Gutknecht (R-MN), Virgil Goode
(I-VA), Jo Anne Emerson (R- MO), Bob Schaffer (R-CO), Pete
Sessions
(R-TX), Barbara Cubin (R-WY), Jeff Flake
(R-AZ), Elton Gallegly (R-CA),
J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ), and
Doc Hastings (R-WA).
Another bad
fire bill, the Wildfire Prevention and Forest Health
Protection Act of 2002, H.R. 5309, introduced by Rep. John
Shadegg
(R-AZ) is somewhat more limited, but also
proposes to suspend
environmental laws and citizen
involvement in any project that involves
thinning or
salvage logging. Cosponsors to this anti- environmental
bill include Reps. James Hansen (R-UT) chairman of the
Resources
Committee, Scott McInnis (R-CO) who is
chairman of the Forest
Subcommittee of the Resources
Committee, Flake, Schaeffer, Gibbons,
Herger, Cubin,
Jack Kingston (R-GA), Peter Hoekstra (R-MI), Doolittle,
Joel Hefley (R-CO), Tancredo, Jim DeMint (R-SC), Ed Bryant
(R-TN),
Peterson, Hayworth and Cannon.
There is a very real danger one of
these bills or some combination could
pass through
committee and be voted on by the full House in September.
Please urge your Representative to oppose both of these
harmful bills.
Stewardship
Contracting Rider May Reappear
As if all this weren't
bad enough, the Bush Administration has now
indicated
that they want permanent stewardship contracting authority to
give away unlimited amounts of trees to pay for fire related
projects.
At a House hearing two weeks ago from all
stakeholders including Chief
Dale Bosworth that we need
to learn more from the existing 84 pilot
projects before
permanently authorizing the program. Despite this, the
administration testified at a hearing last week that they
need this
authority to carry additional restoration and
fuel reduction projects.
Permanent extension of
stewardship contracting was defeated on the Farm
bill
earlier this year and needs to be stopped again.
With your help we can stop the lawless logging
rider/legislation and
stewardship contracting, which
would provide the Forest Service with a
blank check to
pay for unlimited amounts of lawless timber sales.
Please contact your Senators and your Representative this
week at
202/224-3121 and also over the summer recess at
their district offices.
Please ask:
1. Your Senators to
oppose any riders that would suspend environmental
laws
or limit public involvement for forest management decisions. The
last time this happened under the Salvage Logging Rider, the
Forest
Service abused their authority to cut green trees
under the guise of
salvage and to cut old growth forests
in the name of forest health.
2. Your Representative to oppose H.R. 5214, H.R.
5309 and any other
riders or bills that would suspend
environmental laws or limit public
involvement for
forest management decisions.
3. Support directing fuel reduction projects to
the immediate vicinity
of homes and communities. Right
now, only 31% of the acres treated by
the Forest Service
and BLM are close to homes and communities. This
number should be increased to at least 90% of the acres
treated. The
latest scientific review
indicates that a zone 60 meters from structures
and up
to 500 meters for firefighter safety are the maximum areas needed
for legitimate fuel reduction treatments for community
protection.
4. Oppose expanding
stewardship contracting. Logging proponents want
the Forest Service to be able to give away unlimited amounts
of trees to
pay for projects. This program
has been very controversial and a large
number of the
projects are environmental failures. Until the existing
84 pilot projects can fully reviewed and monitored, no
additional
contracts or permanent authority should be
approved.
We are one again
witnessing corporate America doing its worst by
proposing that greed trump the rule of law and for brazenly
fanning
peoples fears of wildland
fire. Rather than concede to hysteria, we
must fight for the truth and to the end, and leave these
corrupt
corporations and the politicians doing their
bidding in the ash heap of
history when we are
through. Thanks for all your efforts.
http://americanlands.org
Thank you for taking ACTION, Care2's eco-alerts newsletter.
Care2 finds the most important environmental alerts,
supported by the world's leading environmental nonprofit
organizations, to empower you to help our environment.
This week we partnered with The Heritage Forest Campaign
to bring you an alert on the threatened Tongass National
Forest! Check it out!
1. Grizzly, Salmon, Bald Eagle Habitat at Risk!
2. Eco-Tips: Save Paper, Reduce Waste
3. Inspirational Quote
*****************************************************
1. Grizzly, Salmon, Bald Eagle Habitat at Risk!
Alaska's Tongass National Forest is
once again under assault!
A current "preservation" plan
will open up over 9 million acres
to logging and mining
development, threatening grizzlies and
bald eagles.
You Can Help Save The Tongass: http://www.care2.com/go/z/2391
The Tongass National Forest-- a
dramatic landscape of glacial
fjords, volcanic
mountains, misty rainforests, giant conifers,
and
luxurious tundra-- contains rich salmon spawning grounds,
prime grizzly bear habitat and the world's densest
population
of bald eagles.
Because of the unique nature of the Tongass, a federal court
required the Bush Administration to review all roadless
areas for
permanent protection. Unfortunately, a variety
of sound
environmental options were rejected. Instead, a
proposal was
put forward that heavily favors the
commercial timber industry!
The so-called permanent
protection proposal recommends NO
PROTECTION for
roadless areas and offers no new wilderness
designations.
The clearly better alternative is the Alaska Rainforest
Conservation
Proposal, Alternative 6. It is a sensible
plan that SAFEGUARDS
VALUABLE OLD GROWTH STANDS and
other pristine areas of
the Tongass.
With more than 30 large-scale timber
sales moving forward in the
Tongass, we need you to take
action NOW. The Forest Service has
asked for your
opinion in a special public comment period. So
please
tell the Forest Service today that you want this area
protected. DEADLINE AUGUST 17th!
Help Now, it's FREE: http://www.care2.com/go/z/2391
Our national forests are national
treasures and once they're
gone, they're gone forever.
**********
2. Eco-Tips: Save Paper,
Reduce Waste
* Buy recycled
paper whenever possible. Not only does
it save trees,
but it cuts down on pollution and toxic
waste.
* Get rid of junk mail. Write to
your credit card company
and tell them to stop sending
you promotional offers.
*********
3. Inspirational Quote
"Friends at home! I charge you to
spare, preserve, and
cherish some portion of your
primitive forest; for when
these are cut away I
apprehend they will not be easily
replaced."
--
Horace Greeley, New York Tribune, 1851
Natural Resources Defense Council's
LEGISLATIVE WATCH
August 1, 2002
Contents:
1) Legislative Watch
2) About Our Bulletins/How to Subscribe & Unsubscribe
3) About NRDC/How to Contact Us
The information in this bulletin is
also available on our website at
http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/legwatch.asp. The web
version links
to the text of bills and congressional web
pages. To take action on
these and other environmental
issues, visit NRDC's Earth Action
Center at http://www.nrdc.org/action, where you can use our online
activism tools or subscribe to Earth Action, our
biweekly activist
bulletin.
1) LEGISLATIVE WATCH
This is a status report on congressional action on the
environment.
To make new or updated sections easy to
find, we've highlighted them
with:
= N O T E ! =
8/1/02
Before leaving for its August recess, Congress advanced
trade
authority and homeland security bills, both of
which could weaken
enforcement of environmental and
public health laws. The House and
Senate completed
action on a supplemental spending bill to fund
defense
and security functions. In addition, a House-Senate
conference committee is continuing negotiations to close the
gap
between House and Senate versions of the energy
bill.
Like Congress, Legislative
Watch will be on recess through Labor Day.
Look for our
next edition in early September.
...
Budget/Appropriations
= N O T E ! =
On 8/1, the Senate
approved the FY '03 Department of Defense spending
bill
(H.R. 5010). The House approved the bill on 6/27. The bill
includes $4.1 billion for departmental pollution prevention
programs,
cleanup of contaminated DOD sites, and other
environmental programs.
= N O T
E ! =
On 7/26, Congress sent a nearly $29 billion
supplemental spending
bill for FY 02 (H.R. 4775) to the
president for his signature. The
bill, which consists
primarily of new funds for homeland security,
was
approved in the Senate by a vote of 92-7 on 7/24, and in the
House by a vote of 397-32 on 7/23. The final version of the
bill does
not include language offered by Rep. Kolbe
(R-AZ) in the House bill
that would exempt the
Department of Defense from the Endangered
Species Act in
certain instances. The bill, however, does include a
provision offered by Sen. Daschle (D-SD) that would waive
environmental review of logging activities on public
lands in South
Dakota. Although it is narrowly tailored,
environmentalists oppose
this provision.
= N O T E ! =
On 7/25, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved S.
2797, which
includes funding for the Environmental
Protection Agency. The bill
contains a significant
increase in funding (more than $670 million
over what
the Bush administration requested) for the EPA and ensures
funding increases for water quality programs, toxic waste
site
clean-ups, and enforcement. Significantly, the bill
also would ensure
that the EPA have sufficient funding
to continue its work in the area
of pesticide
regulation.
= N O T E ! =
Also on 7/25, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved
the
agriculture spending bill. On 7/11, the House
Appropriations
Committee approved its bill to fund the
Agriculture Department. The
bill would restore funding
for watershed protection initiatives that
was cut in
President Bush's budget request, but would limit a new
program that would pay farmers for implementing conservation
practices and setting up wetland reserves.
= N O T E ! =
On 7/24, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved the
bill that
funds energy and water programs (S. 2784).
Environmental groups
oppose an effort by Sen. Bond
(R-MO) to attach a provision to
override the Endangered
Species Act and prevent much-needed reforms
in the
current federal management of Missouri River water flows when
the bill reaches the Senate floor. Current management
practices have
created conditions in the Missouri
watershed that threaten the
continued existence of three
endangered or threatened species.
= N O T E ! =
On 7/18, the Senate
Appropriations Committee approved a bill to fund
the
Department of Commerce and other agencies (S. 2778). The bill
includes funding for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration's ocean and coastal conservation
activities, but
environmentalists note that the bill
does not adequately fund NOAA's
fisheries management and
coastal runoff programs.
= N O T
E ! =
Also on 7/18, the budget for federal foreign
operations (S. 2779) was
approved by the Senate
Appropriations Committee. It includes solid
funding
levels for biodiversity, tropical rainforest conservation,
and renewable energy programs in developing countries.
On 7/17, the House passed the
Interior Department's FY 03 funding
bill, H.R. 5093. The
House added modest funds for conservation
programs --
most of which were allocated to state wildlife grants and
cooperative endangered species programs -- and for fire
management.
Rep. Hinchey (D-NY) added a provision that
would prohibit funding of
oil and gas drilling in the
Finger Lakes National Forest in New York.
A few
environmentally-friendly amendments were adopted, including a
provision offered by Rep. Capps (D-CA) and Rep. Rahall
(D-WV) to
prevent federal funds from being used to
develop 36 California
offshore drilling leases. An
amendment from Rep. Blumenauer (D-OR) to
ensure that
commercial farmers who lease land in national refuges
reduce their use of pesticides and comply fully with refuge
regulations was defeated. The Senate version of the
Interior bill (S.
2708) was approved in committee on
6/27. Both bills contain language
that would expand
damaging grazing practices on public lands.
Environmentalists want the final bill to include increased
funding
for the Land Conservation, Preservation, and
Infrastructure
Improvement program, and are hoping to
prevent money slated for the
Land and Water Conservation
Fund from being siphoned off to cover
other expenses.
Also on 7/17, under pressure
from fiscal conservatives, the House
Republican
leadership decided to revisit the spending allocations in
the budget plan passed by the House Appropriations Committee
on 6/23.
Environmentalists are concerned that the
decision increases the
likelihood that environmental
spending will be further reduced in
future bills.
See NRDC's analysis of the Bush
budget.
http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/abudget03.asp
For a step-by-step guide to our
annual odyssey through resolutions,
reconciliations and
appropriations, see NRDC's budget process fact
sheet.
http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/fbudg.asp
...
Clean Air and Energy
= N O T E ! =
On 7/29, the Bush
administration's plan for regulating pollution from
power plants (the "Clear Skies Initiative") was introduced
in the
House (H.R. 5266) by Rep. Barton (R-TX) and Rep.
Tauzin (R-LA), and
in the Senate (S. 2815) by Sen. Smith
(R-NH). This bill would set
significantly weaker limits
for several key pollutants than a measure
already passed
by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
(S.
556). Unlike S. 556, the administration's bill ignores carbon
dioxide emissions, which are largely responsible for global
warming.
The bill also would repeal and weaken current
safeguards for meeting
public health standards,
protecting local air quality, curbing
pollution from
upwind to downwind states, and protecting national
parks.
= N O
T E ! =
House and Senate energy bill conferees met on
7/25 to address some of
the legislation's less
contentious issues, such as energy production
on Indian
lands, low-income home energy assistance and research on
nuclear power generation. During August and September, the
committee
plans to take up the more controversial
provisions relating to
renewable energy and energy
efficiency, electricity deregulation,
climate change,
ethanol mandates, fuel economy standards, and oil
drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. While the
Senate
defeated attempts to include provisions for
Arctic drilling in its
version of the bill (S. 517), the
House bill (H.R. 4) would allow
drilling in the refuge.
Unlike the House bill, the Senate bill
includes a
provision increasing the use of renewable fuels -- mostly
ethanol -- in gasoline by five billion gallons by 2012. The
Senate
bill also would ban MTBE (a gasoline additive
that has contaminated
drinking water), require companies
to report their emissions of
greenhouse gases, and
require electric providers to produce 4-5
percent of
their energy from new, renewable resources. The House bill
includes over $33 billion in tax incentives that are largely
for the
oil, coal, and nuclear energy industries. The
Senate bill includes
$15 billion in incentives, about
half of which would be available to
improve energy
efficiency in vehicles, appliances, and buildings, as
well as to increase the use of solar, wind, and other
cleaner
alternative energy sources.
On 7/16, the Senate Environment and
Public Works Committee held a
joint hearing with the
Senate Judiciary Committee on the Bush
administration's
recent proposed changes to the "New Source Review"
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Witnesses included
high-level
representatives from the EPA and the
Department of Justice and the
New York Attorney General.
On 6/27, the committee postponed a vote on
issuing a
subpoena to the EPA to gain access to documents related to
the New Source Review changes. Power plants are currently
required to
install pollution-control devices when they
modernize, but the rule
change weakens these protections
and would allow old, dirty power
plants to generate more
pollution than under the existing rules.
On 6/27, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
approved
S. 556, a bill co-authored by committee chair
Sen. Jeffords (I-VT)
and Sen. Lieberman (D-CT), by a
vote of 10-8. The bill seeks to
reduce four types of
power plant emissions by imposing mandatory cuts
in
carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and mercury
emissions. No action has been taken on the House companion
bill (H.R.
1256), which was introduced on 3/27/01 by
Rep. Waxman (D-CA) and Rep.
Boehlert (R-NY). The Bush
administration opposes regulating carbon
dioxide
emissions, arguing that the costs on the economy would be too
high.
NRDC
has detailed an energy policy that would provide a secure energy
future without destroying wilderness or rolling back
environmental
safeguards in reports including Dangerous
Addiction: Ending America's
Oil Dependence
(http://www.nrdc.org/air/transportation/oilsecurity/securityinx.asp)
and A Responsible Energy Policy for the 21st Century
(http://www.nrdc.org/air/energy/rep/repinx.asp).
...
Clean Water
On 6/6, the Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee
on Clean
Air, Wetlands, and Climate Change held a
hearing to examine the
impact of Bush administration
changes to the Clean Water Act that
could make it easier
for mining companies and other industrial
operations to
dump waste into U.S. waters. On 5/3, the Bush
administration finalized a change to Clean Water Act rules
that would
expressly allow dumping of waste from
mountaintop removal coal mining
into streams, rivers,
lakes, wetlands, and other waters. Five days
later, on
5/8, a federal district court blocked the Army Corps of
Engineers from issuing any additional permits for disposal
of
mountaintop removal mining waste in these waters (the
administration
is appealing the court's decision). Also
on 5/8, Rep. Pallone (D-NJ)
and Rep. Shays (R-CT)
introduced H.R. 4683, which would reverse the
administration's changes.
On 6/5, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee
approved
Sen. Boxer's (D-CA) and Sen. Feinstein's (D-CA)
bill to reauthorize
CALFED (S. 1768), an important
federal and state partnership in
California that
provides water for urban and agricultural users, as
well
as for wildlife and habitat restoration. The committee approved
an amendment to the bill, crafted through negotiations among
Sen.
Feinstein, Sen. Kyl (R-AZ), and Sen. Murkowski
(R-AK), to limit the
program's duration and level of
funding. Environmentalists want to
ensure that, as the
bill goes to the Senate floor for debate,
agricultural
water use is not given priority over the environment. On
5/2, Rep. Tauscher (D-CA) and Rep. Napolitano (D-CA)
introduced a
similar bill (H.R. 4657) in the House.
Environmentalists oppose a
related bill (H.R. 3208) by
Rep. Calvert (R-CA) that would allow the
construction of
new dams in California without appropriate review,
and
could give agricultural water users priority over the
environment.
On 5/16, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
passed the
Water Investment Act of 2002 (S. 1961) by a
vote of 13-6. The bill,
which was introduced by Sens.
Graham (D-FL), Jeffords (I-VT), Smith
(R-NH), Warner
(R-VA), and Crapo (R-ID), authorizes significant
increases in funding for cleaner water. Environmental groups
are
seeking to ensure that the bill provides incentives
for states and
cities to fund water quality projects
that are good for the
environment, such as stream
buffers, wetlands restoration, and
stormwater controls.
Environmentalists are also eager to prevent the
funds
from supporting sprawl or noncompliance with environmental
regulations. The committee approved an amendment from Sen.
Reid
(D-NV) that would create a grant program to help
small public
drinking water systems comply with new
environmental regulations, and
one from Sen. Voinovich
(R-OH) that would reauthorize a wet-weather
grant
program to help remedy sewage overflows. The committee also
accepted amendments from Sen. Wyden (D-OR) to make funding
available
for water conservation projects and provide
loan-forgiveness for
projects that address pollution
runoff. On 4/17 and 3/20, the House
Ways and Means and
Transportation and Infrastructure committees,
respectively, considered the House companion bill (H.R.
3930). This
bill would increase the level of funding
available to states for
clean water projects under the
Clean Water Act by $1 billion per
year, up to a total of
$6 billion in 2007. The Bush administration
objects to
the cost of these bills, claiming that it needs the money
to fund the war on terrorism.
...
Climate
Change
= N O T E ! =
On 7/24, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
held a
hearing on the Bush administration's decision to
abandon an
international treaty to curb global warming
emissions. On 7/11, the
Senate Commerce Committee held
an oversight hearing on the same
topic. Facing criticism
from senators about the administration's
decision to
withdraw from the treaty, administration officials
defended the decision and suggested the need for a long-term
policy.
On 5/2, Rep. Olver
(D-MA) introduced a bill (H.R. 4611) that would
require
companies to report their global warming pollution emissions
to a federal database.
...
Coastal
and Marine Resources
On 7/10,
the House Resources Committee approved by a vote of 23-17
Rep. Gilchrest's (R-MD) controversial bill to reauthorize
the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (H.R. 4749),
the primary law governing fisheries
management in the United States.
The committee rejected
an amendment introduced by Rep. Rahall (D-WV)
that would
have promoted both sustainable management of marine
fisheries and recovery of depleted fish stocks.
Environmentalists
oppose this bill in its present form,
because it contains language
that could lead to
continued overfishing and destroy important fish
habitat.
On
6/13, the House Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation,
Wildlife, and Oceans held a hearing on H.R. 4781, a bill to
reauthorize the Marine Mammal Protection Act, introduced
on 5/17 by
Rep. Gilchrest (R-MD), subcommittee chair.
While the bill does not
change current legal definitions
and standards that protect marine
mammals, the
Department of Defense has tried for years to weaken this
act for years by changing definitions to exempt its
activities.
Environmentalists argue that the Defense
Department's proposal would
limit the circumstances
under which activities potentially harmful to
marine
mammals could be reviewed or restricted.
...
Forests
= N O T E ! =
On 7/25, Sens. Cantwell (D-WA), Warner (R-VA), and Chafee
(R-RI),
among others, introduced a bipartisan bill to
permanently protect our
remaining wild national forests
from roadbuilding and logging (S.
2790). On 6/5, Rep.
Inslee (D-WA) introduced H.R. 4865, similar
legislation
that also would protect wild forests.
...
International Environmental Protections
= N O T E ! =
On 8/1, the Senate passed H.R. 3009, legislation granting
new trade
negotiation authority (called "fast track")
for the president, by a
vote of 64-34. The House
approved the bill, 215-212, on 7/27.
Environmental
groups oppose "fast-track" authority legislation
because
it contains weak environmental standards and safeguards and
inadequate protection for international environmental
agreements.
...
Lands
= N O T E ! =
On 7/31, the Senate
Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved
several
land conservation bills, including S. 1846, which would
protect the Finger Lakes National Forest from oil drilling,
and
several bills to create national heritage trails in
Rhode Island,
Utah, New Mexico, Georgia, Massachusetts
and Nevada.
Due to mounting
opposition, the National Monument Fairness Act (H.R.
2114), sponsored by Rep. Simpson (R-ID), was abruptly pulled
from the
House floor debate schedule on 6/20. The bill
is opposed by Democrats
on the committee because it
would restrict the president's authority
to create
national monuments under the Antiquities Act by requiring
congressional consent within two years after a president
designates
any national monument over 50,000 acres,
thereby preventing quick
presidential action to protect
significant and environmentally
sensitive public lands
and resources.
On 5/16, Rep.
Shays (R-CT) and Rep. Rahall (D-WV) introduced a bill
(H.R. 4748) to reform the 1872 Mining Law. The bill would
for the
first time require mining companies to pay
royalties for minerals
taken from public lands, and to
use that revenue to fund reclamation
and restoration of
abandoned mines. The bill would also strengthen
the
law's environmental protections and cleanup standards for
projects on Interior Department lands.
The House and Senate passed the
final version of the farm bill (H.R.
2646) on 5/2 and
5/8, respectively, and President Bush signed the
bill on
5/13. Conservation programs -- including funding for energy
efficiency and renewable energy programs on farms -- total
about $9
billion of the bill's $45 billion in new
spending. But
environmentalists claim that commodities
subsidies and
environmentally damaging provisions in the
bill will outweigh
conservation funding. For instance,
the bill raises the payment cap
on funding that giant
livestock farms, whose waste management
practices pose a
threat to local water supplies, will be able to
receive.
Several other environmentally damaging provisions, including
language that would have provided incentives to log national
forests,
were ultimately eliminated from the bill.
...
Nuclear
= N
O T E ! =
On 7/23, President Bush signed Public Law No.
107-200, a resolution
designating Yucca Mountain,
Nevada, as the sole repository for the
nation's
high-level radioactive waste. The Senate and House approved
the resolution on 7/9 and 5/8, respectively, overruling
Nevada
Governor Guinn's (R) veto of the site
designation. Opponents of the
selection of Yucca
Mountain, 90 miles from Las Vegas, believe that
the
proposed facility would not adequately protect the public and the
environment from radiation contamination.
...
Public Health
= N O T E ! =
On 7/26, the House
approved the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (H.R.
5005).
The bill includes provisions that would shield companies that
voluntarily provide information relating to national
security from
public disclosure requirements and the
civil consequences of law
violations. Efforts by Rep.
Schakowsky (D-IL) to strike this
provision on the House
floor fell short, 188-240. Environmentalists
argue that
these provisions are unnecessary and would hinder
enforcement of environmental and public safety laws. On
7/24, the
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee approved
its version of the
homeland security bill (S. 2452),
which does not include these
provisions.
= N O T E ! =
On 7/25, the Environmental and Public Works Committee
unanimously
approved Sen. Corzine's (D-NJ) Chemical
Security Act (S. 1602), which
would require the EPA to
conduct vulnerability assessments of
chemical plants;
the plants would then be required to reduce any
hazards
uncovered during the assessments.
= N O T E ! =
On 7/23, the House
passed a pipeline safety bill (H.R. 3609) after
adding
more stringent inspection and enforcement measures. The bill
will likely be considered as part of the energy bill
conference
negotiations.
On 6/27, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
approved a
bill (S. 351), introduced by Sen. Collins
(R-ME) and Sen. Kerry
(D-MA), that would ban the sale of
mercury thermometers and provide
grants for a
thermometer exchange program. Mercury is a dangerous
neurotoxin that causes brain damage and developmental
disabilities.
On 6/12, President
Bush signed the bioterrorism bill into law (Public
Law
No. 107-188.). The new law, which authorizes bioterrorism-related
funds for public health infrastructure, food inspection and
nuclear
security, includes language requiring drinking
water facilities to
assess their vulnerability to
terrorist attacks that could threaten
water supplies. It
also authorizes $20 million to facilitate
cooperation
between the EPA and drinking water facilities to improve
basic security, reduce chemical threats, and develop
emergency
response plans. The House approved the final
version of the bill on
5/22 by a vote of 425-1, and the
Senate followed suit the following
day with a vote of
98-0.
...
Smart Growth
= N O T E ! =
On 7/23, the House Judiciary Committee approved H.R. 3995, a
housing
bill introduced by Rep. Roukema (R-NJ) that
includes a provision that
would require federal agencies
to conduct an affordable housing
impact analysis when
proposing new rules. Environmentalists argue
that the
provision would prevent new environmental, labor, and public
health rules from moving forward, and would not help
low-income
families. The bill could also have a negative
impact on smart growth
initiatives by undermining
emerging alliances between affordable
housing and
environmental advocates.
...
Wilderness and Wildlife Protection
On 7/10, along a nearly party
line vote, the House Resources
Committee approved H.R.
4840, a bill introduced by Rep. Hansen (R-UT)
that would
require additional scrutiny of data when extending extra
protection to an endangered species, but not when
withholding extra
protection. Environmentalists oppose
the bill, along with two others
(Rep. Pombo's (R-CA)
H.R. 3705 and Rep. Walden's (R-OR) H.R. 2829)
that would
modify the Endangered Species Act, making it harder for
the government to protect endangered and threatened species.
These
bills would impose a higher burden on federal
agencies to obtain
additional scientific information on
species and mandate additional
review of that data,
resulting in delay and additional hurdles before
protections could be put in place.
The House and Senate have appointed
conferees to finalize the $393
billion Defense
Authorization bill. The House version of the bill
(H.R.
4546) includes provisions that would give the Department of
Defense broad exemptions under the Endangered Species Act
and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as well as language
that would reduce
protections for Utah wilderness lands.
The provisions were part of a
larger proposal by the
Department of Defense that also included
exemptions from
the Clean Air Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act,
Resource Recovery and Conservation Act, and Superfund.
Democratic
leaders and environmentalists argue that the
exemption provisions
have not received adequate review,
and that language in existing laws
already provides
flexibility for the Defense Department to seek
exemptions on a case-by-case basis. The Senate version of
the bill
(S. 2514) does not contain these harmful
exemptions.
On 5/16, the House
Government Reform Committee held a hearing at
which the
General Accounting Office presented its findings from a
study on the impact of environmental regulations on military
readiness and training. The GAO report concludes that
the Department
of Defense has achieved readiness and has
failed to demonstrate how
and to what extent
environmental laws have negatively affected its
mission.
...
For information on the environmental voting records of
members of
Congress, see the League of Conservation
Voter's National
Environmental Scorecards at http://www.lcv.org/scorecard/index.asp
...........
2) About Our Bulletins/How to
Subscribe & Unsubscribe
NRDC
distributes three bulletins by email. To subscribe to any or all
of them or to join our activist networks, go to
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/subscribe.asp. If you
already
subscribe and want to change your subscriptions
or update your email
address or other information, go to
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/profileeditor (or see the
unsubscribe
information below).
EARTH ACTION is sent biweekly and
calls out urgent environmental
issues requiring
immediate action. To unsubscribe from Earth Action,
send
an email message to earthaction@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in
the subject line.
LEGISLATIVE WATCH is sent biweekly when Congress is in
session and
tracks environmental bills moving through
the federal legislature. To
unsubscribe from Legislative
Watch, send an email message to
legwatch@nrdcaction.org
with REMOVE in the subject line.
The CALIFORNIA ACTIVIST NETWORK ACTION ALERT is distributed
monthly
to members of NRDC's California Activist Network
and provides action
tools to Californians and others
concerned with protecting the
state's natural resources
and the health of its citizens. To
unsubscribe, send an
email message to wildcalifornia@nrdcaction.org
with
REMOVE in the subject line.
...........
3) About NRDC/How to Contact Us
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a nonprofit
environmental
organization with over 500,000 members
nationwide and a staff of
scientists, attorneys and
environmental experts. Our mission is to
protect the
planet's wildlife and wild places and ensure a safe and
healthy environment for all living things.
For more information about NRDC or
how to become a member of NRDC,
please contact us at:
Natural Resources Defense
Council
40 West 20th Street
NY,
NY 10011
212-727-4511 (voice) / 212-727-1773 (fax)
General information: nrdcinfo@nrdc.org
Email subscription questions: nrdcaction@nrdc.org
http://www.nrdc.org
Also visit:
BioGems -- Saving
Endangered Wild Places
A project of the Natural
Resources Defense Council
http://www.savebiogems.org
Action deadline: September 5, 2002
An ominous bill that
would weaken the crucial protections of the
Endangered
Species Act has gathered support in Congress. Please act
now to stop it.
Every species loss diminishes the diversity of life on Earth
with
untold consequences for the web of
life. Sadly, at present rates of
extinction,
as much as 20 percent of the world's species could be gone
in the next 30 years. The Endangered Species Act
is our bulwark
against extinction. As a
result of the act, species like the bald
eagle, the
California condor, the gray wolf, and the black-footed
ferret are making a comeback.
Please forward this email to your friends and urge them to
take
action.
**************************TAKE ACTION NOW!
************************
If you
are a World Wildlife Fund Conservation Action Network member,
you can take action by following the simple steps
below. If you
received this email from a
friend, visit
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/action.asp?step=2&item=1725
to
take action.
TO TAKE ACTION QUICKLY -- hit "reply" to this email and then
"send"
and we will automatically send the message below,
as is, to your
member of Congress.
BETTER YET, ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS
AND GREATLY INCREASE YOUR IMPACT --
Log in to your
Personal Action Center --
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/login.asp -- with
your email
address (alerts@earthhopenetwork.net) and
your password. Once you are in your
Personal
Action Center, click on "Keep the Endangered Species Act
Strong" and follow the instructions for adding your own
thoughts to
your message.
If you have any questions or problems with taking action,
contact us
at
actionquestions@takeaction.worldwildlife.org for help.
****************************LETTER
TEXT******************************
Dear (your representative's name will be inserted here):
I write to urge you to oppose H.R.
4840, the so-called Sound Science
for Endangered Species
Act Planning Act of 2002. This bill would
seriously weaken the Endangered Species Act.
The bill has numerous
flaws. It would seek to limit the ability of
scientists to use the best available science to conserve
endangered
species. It would add independent
scientific review requirements and
extend deadlines in
ways that could be used to delay and hamstring
species
protection. It fails to ensure that reviewers are independent
and come from qualified scientific bodies. It
attempts to drastically
limit the ability of citizens to
petition for species preservation.
And the
bill seeks to give special rights to industry.
The Endangered Species Act is a strong, effective, and
flexible
science-based "safety net" for the many species
hovering on the brink
of extinction. Please
do all you can to oppose H.R. 4840, which poses
a
serious threat to the act.
Sincerely,
Your name and address
will be
inserted here
*************************END OF LETTER
TEXT*************************
______________________________________________________________________
Direct any questions about the WWF Conservation Action
Network to
actionquestions@takeaction.worldwildlife.org
______________________________________________________________________
The Conservation Action Network is sponsored by World
Wildlife Fund-
US. Known worldwide by its
panda logo, WWF is dedicated to
protecting the world's
wildlife and the rich biological diversity
that we all
need to survive. The leading privately supported
international conservation organization in the world, WWF
has
sponsored more than 2,000 projects in 116 countries
and has more than
1 million members in the United
States. WWF calls on everyone --
government,
industry, and individuals -- to take responsibility by
taking action to save our living planet.
World Wildlife Fund
1250 Twenty-fourth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20037
http://www.worldwildlife.org
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org
To: All Activists
From: Steve Holmer
Date: August 2, 2002
Senate Fire Rider Opens Door to More Logging - Ignores
Community
Protection
At a press conference yesterday, a group of Senators called
for the
creation of a new national fire plan that would
prohibit citizen
involvement in fire management
decisions and suspend environmental laws
protecting
Clean Water, Endangered Species and sensitive forest lands.
In addition to Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), Sens. Dianne
Feinstein (D-CA)
and Ron Wyden (D-OR) also were involved
in the press conference.
Sen.
Pete Domenici (R-NM) indicated the legislation would be based on
the precedent set by Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD) in the
Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations bill, which
includes a complete suspension
of environmental laws and
citizen involvement on 8,000 acres of the
Black Hills
National Forest. No final language has been agreed to by
the participants, but discussions about the content and
extent of the
rider are currently underway.
In addition to your own Senators
(202/224-3121), calls are urgently
needed to the
following offices urging them to oppose any forest riders
restricting citizen involvement or that suspend
environmental laws:
Phone Fax
Sen. Tom Daschle 202/224-2321 224-7895
Sen. Ron
Wyden 202/224-5244 228-2717
Sen.
Dianne Feinstein 202/224-3841 228-3954
Also, please contact your Representative and urge him/her to
oppose H.R.
5214, H.R. 5309 and any other riders or
bills that would suspend
environmental laws or limit
public involvement for forest management
decisions.
Other points to mention to your
Senators and Representative:
Support directing fuel reduction projects to the immediate
vicinity of
homes and communities. Right now, only 31%
of the acres treated by the
Forest Service and BLM are
close to homes and communities. This number
should be increased to at least 90% of the acres
treated. The latest
scientific review
indicates that a zone 60 meters from structures and up
to 500 meters for firefighter safety are the maximum areas
needed for
legitimate fuel reduction treatments for
community protection.
Oppose
expanding stewardship contracting. Logging proponents want the
Forest Service to be able to give away unlimited amounts of
trees to pay
for projects. This program has
been very controversial and a large
number of the
projects are environmental failures. Until the existing
84 pilot projects can fully reviewed and monitored, no
additional
contracts or permanent authority should be
approved.
Greenpeace's Positive Energy
July 29
- August 5, 2002
v 2.26
Time for Greenpeace's CLEAN ENERGY NOW! campaign's
weekly good news update!
Inside this edition:
- SustainUS
Wins a Bet with President Bush
- Greenpeace Activist
Tells All
- The Kill Zone
+++++
SustainUS Wins a Bet with
President Bush
Remember the bet
that youth across the nation
were waging with President
Bush? SustainUS, a
network of students and
youth groups dedicated to
sustainable development, waged
a bet with President
Bush that the nation's young people
could collectively
conserve 20,000 tons of carbon
dioxide by July 31st.
They won the bet by
1800 tons!
Now that
the bet is won, President Bush should go
to Jo'burg and
attend the World Summit on Sustainable
Development this
August in South Africa, accompanied
by U.S. youth
delegates who will sharing
their visions of a
sustainable future.
To read more about the winners,
go
to: http://www.sustainus.org
To learn about Greenpeace's Youth Delegation to the
WSSD, go to:
http://www.greenpeaceusa.org/features/wssd.htm
+++++
Greenpeace Activist Tells All
The day in the life of Greenpeace Clean Energy Now!
Campaigner Kristin Casper is featured in this week's
Grist Magazine. Her daily entries tell the story
of her life living and working for a clean energy
future. Her grassroots work extends from local issues
in California, to working with a national youth delegation
that will be sending a strong message to the White
House - "Bush: Don't Burn Our Planet."
To here what Kristin has to say, go
to:
http://www.gristmagazine.com
+++++
The Kill Zone
Are you living in the shadow of a
nuclear reactor zone?
This week, Greenpeace
unveiled its zip code nuclear
indicator zone, where you
type in your zip code and
find out how close you are to
high-risk areas. Don't
you wish this indicator were for
clean energy zones
instead? Type in your zip
code and take action in your
nuclear reactor kill zone
to demand clean energy!
To find
out how close you are to a nuclear reactor, go to:
http://www.greenpeaceusa.org/nuclear/locator.htm
The "Positive Energy" newsletter and our web site,
http://www.cleanenergynow.org, will give you good news
about ways to achieve clean air, climate justice, and
renewable energy solutions to our ongoing energy
crisis.
Want to do
more? Become a Greenpeace member today!
To
give online, go to: https://www.greenpeaceusa.org/join2/cen.htm
EarthNet News
... a
project of the Center for Environmental Citizenship
http://www.envirocitizen.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
August 4, 2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's EarthNet's July review!
The long summer days
are growing shorter but there's
still plenty of time
for reading. And in this issue we
point you to some
great stuff in our GREEN READING
sections.
July was a hot one
reminding many of us of exactly
how serious climate
change is. Read about some striking
new evidence coming
out of Alaska's sweating glaciers
in MERCY, MERCY ME.
Plus, check out how the auto industry
fits into all of
this and what you could do about it
in CORPORATE CORNER.
Meanwhile, WHO'S WHO will keep
you inspired and remind
you that you're not
alone.
Remember:
EarthNet is in the summer cycle. That means
we're
publishing monthly and looking at a review of
the
month's most interesting enviro news. We'll be
back to
our regularly scheduled weekly programming
come
September.
--Zachariah Silk, EarthNet Editor
mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Corporate Corner: Chug, Chug,
Chug
2. Quote of the Week
3. Glimmer of Hope: What's freedom, Willy?
4. Mercy, Mercy Me: Don't Sweat It
5. Who's Who
6. Green Reading I
7. Green Reading II
8. Jobs and
Internships
9. Conferences and
Gatherings
10. Activist Phone Book &
EarthNet News Info
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATE CORNER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CHUG, CHUG, CHUG
Courtesy of Environmental Defense...
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/z1qAAaF1mcDd/
It may be common knowledge that the
United States is
the world's largest greenhouse gas
polluter - sending
a quarter of the world's carbon
dioxide (CO2) out into
the atmosphere, where it and
other greenhouse gases
form a heat-trapping blanket
around the earth. But
did you know that American cars
and light trucks alone
emit more carbon dioxide than
almost every other nation
on earth?
To grasp the enormity of the
problem, consider this:
Chrysler's Jeep Grand Cherokee,
weighing just under
two tons, emits over three times its
body weight in
CO2 per year. Now imagine all the
millions of cars
on the road today, and you start to get
the picture.
Clearly, controlling CO2 emissions from
cars and light
trucks by improving their fuel efficiency
would be
one of the most important steps we can take to
curb
global warming, as well as reducing our country's
dependence
on oil imports.
A new report from Environmental
Defense called Automakers'
Corporate Carbon Burdens
introduces the notion of a
corporate carbon burden - how
much carbon a car maker's
fleet will pollute over the
course of its life. Says
co-author and car expert John
DeCicco, "we cannot affix
blame on SUVs alone or expect
hybrid cars alone to
solve the problem, but rather, we
need to lift all
ships, so to speak - all cars, trucks,
SUVs, minivans,
pickups - to higher efficiency levels.
That would lower
CO2 emissions and reduce the carbon
burden in a significant
way."
TAKE ACTION NOW:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/1pqAAaF1mcDA/THE_PLEDGE
Click here to tell automakers to clean up their act.
FOR MORE
INFO:
**Environmental Defense's Report
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/z7qAAaF1mcDB/
** Interview with John DeCicco
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/zdqAAaF1mcDc/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE OF THE MONTH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Power tends to corrupt, and
absolute power corrupts
absolutely.
-- John Emerich Edward Dalberg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GLIMMER OF HOPE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT'S FREEDOM, WILLY?
Summer is the time for family
reunions. Whales included.
A year after the mother of
Orca killer whale A-73 --
also known as Springer --
disappeared, the orphan was
reunited with a pod
including her grandmother and other
relatives near Puget
Sound this July 14th. The two-year-old
Orca spent the
last six months being studied and cared
for by a team of
researchers while waiting for a pod
to come near enough
for her release. Scientists will
now follow her
movements via radio and a network of
wale-watchers with
the hope that she will be welcomed
into the pod and
adopted by an older whale. Eventually,
they expect her
either to move from pod to pod or to
be more solitary.
Springer has captivated area residents
and scientists
alike and they are all rooting for her
speedy adjustment
to the open ocean. But there's a
larger, more tragic
story behind this mammal interest
story. Springer and
her kind are becoming increasingly
rare in the Puget
Sound and the government isn't doing
much about it.
FOR MORE INFO:
**Seattle Weekly Article 08-01-02
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/L1qAAaF1mcD5/
** People for Puget Sound
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/S7qAAaF1mcDf/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MERCY, MERCY ME
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DON'T SWEAT IT
A study published in the journal
Science the week of
July 15th declared that glaciers in
Alaska have been
melting faster than we realized.
Researchers at the
University of Alaska in Fairbanks
found that, on average,
glaciers are melting away at
rate of six feet each
year. Because these glaciers are
hanging our on shore,
the water they're sweating runs
into the ocean -- displacing
ocean water and causing a
rise in sea level. And rising
sea levels lead to
flooding and saltwater in fragile
brackish ecosystems.
Turns out the sea level near Alaska
is changing faster
now than it has for the past ten
thousand years. The
release of the study adds to the
hunch that the climate
is changing at an alarming rate.
In the past thirty
years, Alaska's temperature has
risen an astounding four
times the global average.
FOR MORE INFO:
**
Science Magazine
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/SpqAAaF1mcDv/
** Washington Post Article 07-18-02
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/LdqAAaF1mcDt/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WHO'S WHO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
HOT POTATOES?
"Green Plans," "Affluenza," "Escape
from Affluenza,"
"Running Out of Time," "Visible
Target," "Garden Song,"
"Circle of Plenty," "Genetic
Time Bomb," and "Hot Potatoes."
These are all likely
things to be find on signs at
an environmental
activist's protest. Well, maybe not
that last one. They
are also all the titles of films
by the award-winning
environmental documentary film
director/producer John
DeGraaf. "Hot Potatoes" included.
Born in 1946, DeGraaf
has been producing films for
both US public television
and commercial television
for more than twenty years.
One of his more recent
films, "Green Plans," measures
the progress of the
environmental movement against its
surrounding rhetoric
in The Netherlands and New Zealand.
And "Hot Potatoes"?
It chronicles the search for an
environmentally sustainable
solution to potato blight
for developing countries.
DeGraaf will be speaking at
this year's Environmental
Journalism Academy in Seattle,
WA courtesy of us, the
Center for Environmental
Citizenship.
FOR
MORE INFO:
**A little more about De
Graaf
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/S1qAAaF1mcD4/
**Environmental Journalism Academy
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/q1qAAaF1mcDM/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GREEN READING I
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check it out from Grist
Magazine... http://www.gristmagazine.com/
LET THEM EAT CARBON
The Bush administration has turned
its back on climate
change. But when the federal
government drops the ball,
someone else is bound to pick
it up: All across the
country, concerned Americans are
taking action on climate
change. In dorm rooms and
boardrooms, in city halls
and houses of worship,
activists are taking it upon
themselves to protect the
global climate. Come meet
the new climate movement in
"Power Shift: Looking for
Leadership on Climate Change,"
a special edition of
Grist Magazine.
**Grist Magazine Exclusive
Power Shift -- looking for leadership on climate change
-- a special edition of Grist
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/zpqAAaF1mcDX/?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GREEN READING II
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU
HEAR
In this modern age, it's
hard to know what's real.
We often assume the glut of
information we're hit withe
everyday is legit. But how
do we know if we are getting
the whole story? Whose spin
has distorted the information?
John Stauber, the
executive director of the Center
for Media and
Democracy, and Sheldon Rampton, the editor
of PR Watch,
answer these questions and provide historical
background
on public relations cover ups in their book
*Toxic
Sludge Is Good for You: Lies, Damn Lies and
the Public
Relations Industry*. Clearly written and
critically
acclaimed, this book is especially pertinent
as
environmental scientists and big industry lobbyists
engage in the continuing argument over the accuracy
and exaggeration of environmental problems caused by
pollution. The book challenges the propaganda and censorship
of PR firms. For your daily dose of truth and
skepticism,
add this book to your summer reading list.
FOR MORE INFO:
**Go to the source
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/SdqAAaF1mcDr/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JOBS AND INTERNSHIPS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These are a sampling of the over
200 environmental
and activist jobs and internships
listed at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/index.asp
Job Title: Campus Energy Efficiency
Coordinator
Organization: Illinois Student Environmental
Network
Location: Urbana, IL
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/apqAAaF1mcDe/
Job Title: Research Intern
Organization: Container Recycling Institute
Location: Arlington, VA
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/a7qAAaF1mcD3/
Job Title: Environmental
Professionals
Organization: Ecology &
Environment, Inc.
Location: Las Vegas, NV
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/adqAAaF1mcDx/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFERENCES, GATHERINGS AND VIEWINGS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lots more events listed at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/index.asp
Event: Northwest Renewable Energy
Festival
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Date: 9/20/2002 - 9/22/2002
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/q7qAAaF1mcD2/
Event: Save the Mesas Music Festival
Location: Golden, CO
Date:
8/25/2002
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/a1qAAaF1mcDs/
Event: Greening the Campus: Values
in Action
Location: Amherst, MA
Date: 10/26/2002
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/qpqAAaF1mcDw/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVIST PHONE BOOK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Capitol Switchboard:
202.224.3121
White House Comment Line:
202.456.1111
White
House Address:
1600 Pennsylvania
Ave
Washington, DC 20500
Senate Address:
US Senate
Washington, DC
20510
House
Address:
US House of
Representatives
Washington, DC
20515
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Write your own short articles
for submission to EarthNet.
We are particularly
interested in articles about student
activism on your
campus.
For general
comments:
mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
Submit Jobs/Internships/Volunteer
listings at:
http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/add.asp
Submit Events at:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/qdqAAaF1mcDN/
--------------------------------------------------
Visit the web address below and tell
your friends about
this important issue!
http://actionnetwork.org/join-forward.html?domain=san&r=rdqAAaF1mcFt
Sign up for Student Action
Network at:
http://actionnetwork.org/san/join.html?r=rdqAAaF1mcFtE
From: Steve Holmer
Date: August 6, 2002
Fire Rider to Suspend Laws &
Citizen Involvement Barreling Forward
Collective amnesia is a dangerous thing. But it
would appear that the
U.S. Congress has forgotten what a
joy the Salvage Logging Rider was for
the National
Forests, the U.S. Forest Service and those lawmakers who
supported lawless logging. Now is a good time to
remind them because
the Senate is currently negotiating
a new logging rider and two bad
bills have been
introduced in the House.
Please
contact your Senators and your Representatives at 202/224-3121 or
at their district offices and urge them to:
Oppose any fire related riders or
legislation that would suspend
environmental laws or
citizen involvement. Remind them that the last
time environmental laws were suspended in the name of
"forest health"
under the Salvage Logging Rider, the
forests were heavily abused, the
public was outraged and
Forest Service credibility was seriously
undermined. Tell them that an effective
fire program should focus on
non-controversial projects
to protect homes and communities, not
re-polarizing the
logging debate and creating new controversy.
In addition to your own Senators calls are also urgently
needed to the
following offices urging them to oppose
any forest riders restricting
citizen involvement or
that suspend environmental laws:
Phone Fax
Sen. Ron Wyden
(D-OR) 202/224-5244 228-2717
Sen. Dianne Feinstein
(D-CA) 202/224-3841 228-3954
Sen. Tom Daschle
(D-SD) 202/224-2321 224-7895
Fire
Scientists Defend Beschta Report Against Forest Service Attack
A group of top Northwest scientists have rebuked Forest
Service Chief
Bosworth in a letter defending their 1995
report entitled, “Wildfire and
Salvage Logging,
Recommendations for Ecologically Sound Post-Fire
Salvage
Management and Other Post-Fire Treatments” (Beschta et al.,
1995). Bosworth has blamed the report,
which has served as the basis
for recent federal court
decisions unfavorable to the agency, to
contributing to
the “analysis paralysis” that slows agency logging
projects.
However, scientists from the University of Washington,
Oregon State,
Idaho State University, Pacific Rivers
Council, and the Center for
Biological Diversity told
Congress that the Forest Service is mired in
conflict of
its own doing.
“The agency often
strives to ignore or deny the vast body of knowledge
that has accumulated in recent decades, and instead favors
antiquated
policies,” the scientists
said. “The [Forest Service] diverts staff and
money to extraordinarily costly salvage logging projects at
the expense
of reducing...the road network or
undertaking needed fine-fuels
reductions in unburned
forests. [Such a direction] is not only a recipe
for controversy, but also a recipe for the continued
deterioration of
forested landscapes. Humans,
too, suffer when these resources are
degraded, as will
often happen if the forest practices advocated by the
chief...are continued.”
Bosworth has still called the report “[a document] of
questionable
science proposed for an advocacy group that
has never been
peer-reviewed.” But, The
Beschta Report was peer-reviewed by
researchers at
Oregon State and more than 50 others who endorsed it in a
letter to the president. “It was peer-reviewed
more than most
peer-reviewed papers are,” said James
Karr, a professor of aquatic
sciences and zoology at the
University of Washington. “And far more than
the Forest
Service’s own work is peer-reviewed.”
Deteriorating forest roads and overgrown, flammable stands
pose the most
immediate threats to forests, the
scientists told Congress. “There’s
this huge
need to do fuel reduction, yet they seem to have this huge
interest in doing salvage logging,” Beschta
said. “They could have been
aggressively
thinning forests over the last decade, and I don’t know if
they could have made a dent, but they certainly could have
gotten
further than they have.”
For more information, download the
report at
http://www.westerntrout.org/trout/Reports/bosworth_response_to_Salvage_Report.pdf.
Dear Members of Global Response's "Quick Response Network:"
Attached is an article by
Raimunda Monteiro, a Brazilian activist with the
Movement for the Development of the Transamazon and the
Xingu (MDTX), giving
excellent background on the recent
murders of two community leaders in Para
state. If you
have not yet sent a fax/letter to the president of Brazil,
please review our recent action alert, below, and send a
letter today.
Thanks.
GLOBAL RESPONSE EMERGENCY ACTION --
BRAZIL -- ISSUED 7/25/02
Another
social and environmental activist in the state of Para, Brazil, has
been murdered.
Last fall Global Response initiated an international
letter-writing campaign
to bring to justice the
murderers of Ademir Federicci ("Dema"), who was
organizing protests against the construction of huge dams on
the Xingu River
(see http://www.globalresponse.org/gra_index/gra0501.html.
Although we were
successful in persuading the Brazilian
government to order a federal
investigation into the
murder, Dema's associates say there's been no
progress
on the case.
Last Sunday, rural
union leader Bartolomeu Morais da Silva ("Brasilia") was
found brutally murdered. Brasilia was a leader in
the small farmers'
struggle to stop illegal logging,
land fraud, and destructive large-scale
infrastructure
projects. His organization, the Altamira Union, calls for
creating two very large protected areas to be managed by
local communities.
Such proposals directly conflict with
the interests of large ranchers who
are seizing and
clearing huge areas for soy plantations and cattle ranches.
Farmers unions and other community
organizations in Para state report an
atmosphere of
impunity, where the wealthy are getting away with murder and
the poor are terrorized for opposing large-scale
environmentally destructive
development projects.
Please write again to the president
of Brazil and demand immediate and
complete federal
investigations into the murders of Dema and Brasilia. Let
him know that the international community expects him to
guarantee the
rights and safety of community activists
in Para state, and their full
participation in
decision-making concerning development of the region.
Thanks to Environmental Defense for
drafting the following Action Alert:
**************
-URGENT ACTION-
Rural Union Leader Brutally Murdered
in Brazilian Amazon
Government
road project unleashes violence, deforestation on lawless
frontier
July
23, 2002
On July 21, 2002 rural
union leader Bartolomeu Morais da Silva, "Brasília",
was
murdered in the town of Castelo dos Sonhos, Pará state in the Brazilian
Amazon. The activist's body was found by the side
of the Cuiabá Santarém
highway with 12 gunshot wounds
and broken legs. Brasília had denounced
large ranchers
and their gunmen to state and federal authorities for a
campaign of threats and violence to take small farmers'
land. The federal
government has promised to
pave 1,000 kilometers of the Cuiabá - Santarém
road to
increase soybean exports, and mega-ranchers are taking over and
declaring themselves the owners of vast expanses of forest
lands along the
road in the expectation of price
increases and expansion of soy farming.
Many of these
areas are already occupied by small farming families. State
and federal governments have essentially abandoned the
region to
environmental devastation and feudal rule by
the soy and cattle barons.
In June of this year, military police from the neighboring
town of Novo
Progresso arbitrarily arrested 19 rural
workers, who were farming an area
claimed by ranchers.
The nineteen were imprisoned for thirty days without
being charged. In April 2002, rancher Nilton
Albuquerque de Barros with
hired gunmen attempted to
force various families off of an area he claimed
to
own. The farmers succeeded in disarming the gunmen, and delivered the
weapons to the police, who took no action.
Brasilia denounced these and similar
abuses to the relevant authorities in
both the national
and state capitals, as well as reporting the repeated
death threats he was receiving because of his work
organizing small farmers
along the Cuiabá Santarem
road. No action was taken.
Rural worker's unions in the Amazon, such as the Altamira
Rural Worker's
Union that Brasilia represented in
Castelo dos Sonhos, have taken a leading
role in
fighting illegal logging, land fraud, and destructive large-scale
infrastructure projects, while proposing sustainable
alternatives and
large-scale protected
areas. The Altamira Union is calling for the creation of
two very large protected areas to be managed by local
communities
"extractive reserves" in a neighboring
region. Such proposals directly
conflict with
large ranchers' interest in seizing and clearing huge areas
for soy plantations and cattle ranches. The
paving of the Cuiabá
Santarém road is expected to result
in the deforestation of 25,000 to 53,000
square
kilometers of new deforestation -- an area between the sizes of West
Virginia and Florida in the coming twenty years, unless
measures to avoid
it are taken.
Nearly a year ago, union leader and
activist Ademir Federicci, "Dema" was
assassinated in
Altamira, Pará, and essentially no progress has been made
in bringing his killers to justice. This only worsens the
climate of
judicial impunity for the perpetrators such
crimes on the frontier.
Please
Fax Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, respectfully
requesting that he charge the Federal Police with
investigating the murder
of Brasilia and bringing the
perpetrators to justice. A sample text
follows:
Ilmo. Exmo. Sr.
Fernando Henrique
Cardoso
Presidente
da Republica do Brasil
Palacio do Planalto
Brasilia, DF
Brasil
fax: Int'l code+
55-61-411-2222
Dear Mr. President,
I am deeply concerned by the brutal torture and murder of
union leader
Bartolomeu Morais da Silva in Castelo dos
Sonhos, Pará on July 21. This
brazen
assassination follows the murder of Ademir Federicci, "Dema", in
Altamira, Pará nearly a year ago, in which police have made
not even
a plausible pretence of investigating the
crime. Your government's planned
infrastructure development program for this region, in the
absence of any
organized effort to control its social
and environmental effects or instill
respect for the
most basic human rights, appears to have generated a
chaotic land boom and a climate of total impunity for large
scale ranchers
engaged in seizing huge tracts along the
road.
I urge you to assign the
Federal Police to investigate this heinous crime,
since
local authorities are clearly unable or unwilling to do so. Failure
to bring to justice the killers of Bartolomeu Morais da
Silva, and of Dema,
as you know, will inevitably lead to
further violence and repeated
atrocities.
Sincerely,
********************************
Paula Palmer, Executive Director
Global Response
P.O. Box 7490
Boulder CO 80306
USA
TEL: 303-444-0306
FAX: 303-449-9794
Email: paula@globalresponse.org
Website: http://www.globalresponse.org
Global Response empowers people of
all ages, cultures, and nationalities to
protect the
environment by creating partnerships for effective citizen
action. At the request of indigenous peoples and
grassroots organizations,
Global Response organizes
international letter-writing campaigns to help
communities prevent environmental
destruction. Global Response involves
young
people as well as adults in these campaigns, to develop in them the
skills for global citizen cooperation and earth
stewardship.
Alaska's grizzlies need your help!
A recent "preservation" plan for
Alaska's Tongass National
Forest will open up over 9
million acres to logging and
mining development,
threatening grizzlies and bald eagles.
You Can Help Save The Tongass:
http://www.care2.com/go/z/2424
The Tongass wilderness houses salmon
spawning grounds, prime
grizzly bear habitat, and the
world's densest population of
bald eagles. Yet, over 30
pending large-scale timber sales
threaten the region and
its wildlife.
Please tell the
Forest Service today that you want this area
protected.
http://www.care2.com/go/z/2424
Deadline: August 17th!
Background: Because of the unique nature of the Tongass, a
federal court required the Bush Administration to review
all roadless areas for permanent protection.
Unfortunately,
a variety of sound environmental options
were rejected.
Instead, a proposal was put forward that
heavily favors the
commercial timber industry! The
so-called permanent protection
proposal recommends NO
PROTECTION for roadless areas and offers
no new
wilderness designations.
The
eco-friendly alternative, the Alaska Rainforest Conservation
Proposal, Alternative 6, SAFEGUARDS VALUABLE OLD GROWTH
STANDS
and other pristine areas of the Tongass.
The Forest Service has asked for
your opinion in a special public
comment period. So
please tell them today that you want this area
protected. DEADLINE AUGUST 17th!
Help Now, it's FREE: http://www.care2.com/go/z/2424
Our national forests are national
treasures and once they're gone,
they're gone forever.
Thank you for your help!
Rachel Saunders
Eco-Activism Manager
Care2 & ThePetitionSite.com
========================================
NRDC's EARTH ACTION:
The Bulletin
for Environmental Activists
August 7, 2002
========================================
In This Issue:
--Action alerts--
1. CHILDREN'S HEALTH: Tell the EPA to protect kids from
dangerous
pesticides in foods
2. AIR POLLUTION: Tell the Bush
administration not to weaken our
clean air rules
--Updates on Previous alerts--
1. Homeland security legislation
2. National forest protection
======================================================
You will also find these alerts in NRDC'S Earth Action
Center, which
includes tools for taking action easily
online, at
http://www.nrdc.org/action
(Please do not reply to this message; see the instructions
below for
how to unsubscribe or contact NRDC with
questions or comments.)
=============
Action alerts
=============
1. CHILDREN'S HEALTH
Tell the EPA to
protect kids from dangerous pesticides in foods
In the past six months, the Environmental Protection Agency
has
approved a number of new uses for more than a dozen
old and dangerous
pesticides, including one previously
used to make Agent Orange, a
military herbicide used
during the Vietnam War. These toxic
pesticides will now
be used on common foods -- including kids'
favorites
like grapes, strawberries, peaches, and blueberries -- even
though safe and effective alternatives are
available.
In
allowing these new pesticide uses, the EPA ignored requirements
intended to protect children from exposure to these
dangerous
chemicals. Young children's organs are still
developing, and their
bodies and immune systems may be
more vulnerable to toxic chemicals;
they can also be
exposed to far more pesticide residue than adults.
The
Food Quality Protection Act -- passed unanimously by Congress in
1996 -- therefore typically requires the EPA to set the safe
level of
pesticide exposure for kids at one-tenth of the
safe level for
adults.
But the EPA ignored this part of the law in allowing the new
pesticide uses, even while admitting that the risks to
children are
not fully understood. In light of signs
that some pesticides harm
children's developing brains
and nervous systems, the EPA has ordered
chemical
manufacturers to do more research on these pesticides. But
in the meantime, the EPA nevertheless has decided to approve
these
new pesticide uses now, without taking the
required steps to protect
kids.
The EPA is accepting public comments
until August 19th on whether or
not kids deserve
additional protection from pesticide exposure.
== What to do ==
Send a message to
the EPA before the August 19 deadline, urging the
agency
to protect kids from harmful levels of pesticides in food.
== Contact information ==
You can send an official comment directly from NRDC's Earth
Action
Center at http://www.nrdc.org/action/. Or use the contact
information
and sample letter below to send your own
message, and please include
your own reasons why you
want the government to protect children from
pesticide
exposure.
Docket # OPP-2002-0057
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pesticide Programs
Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB)
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C)
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
Email: opp-docket@epa.gov
== Sample letter ==
Subject: Re: Docket #
OPP-2002-0057 - Protect kids from pesticides
Dear Administrator Whitman and EPA Staff,
In light of the uncertainties
concerning the full risks of children's
exposure to
toxic pesticides, the EPA must follow the law and set the
safe level for children at one-tenth the safe level for
adults.
Children are uniquely
sensitive to pesticides -- they are not "little
adults."
Their bodies are still developing and are potentially more
vulnerable to the harms caused by toxic chemicals. And
children are
exposed more than adults, because they eat
and drink much more for
their size.
The EPA has admitted that it does
not have all the necessary
information on the effects of
these pesticides. The harms could be
devastating:
pesticide exposure may disrupt the normal development of
a child's brain and nervous system.
I expect the EPA to protect my
family and me from public health
threats. The fact that
millions of children are exposed to
pesticide-laced food
at potentially unsafe levels certainly qualifies
as such
a threat. Again, I urge the EPA to give kids the extra
protection from pesticides in their food that the law
requires.
Sincerely,
[Your name and address]
2. AIR POLLUTION
Tell the Bush administration not to weaken our clean air
rules
In the most aggressive
attack that the Clean Air Act has faced in its
30-year
history, the Bush administration has let big corporations
dictate the rewriting of rules that protect the public
against
uncontrolled increases in air pollution from
power plants, oil
refineries, and manufacturing
facilities. If the new rules go into
effect, it will
mean tens of thousands more asthma attacks,
hospitalizations, and premature deaths in this country
*every year.*
== What to do ==
Tell the administration to start listening to the
American public
instead of industry lobbyists, and to
shelve the new rules.
== For
background ==
The Bush Administration's Air Pollution
Plan
http://www.nrdc.org/air/pollution/fclearsk.asp
== Contact information ==
You can send a message to EPA Administrator Christie Whitman
directly
from NRDC's Earth Action Center at http://www.nrdc.org/action/. Or
use the contact information and sample letter below to send
your own
message.
Administrator Christie Whitman
U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
Fax: 202-501-1450
Email: whitman.christine@epamail.epa.gov
== Sample letter ==
Subject: Don't weaken New
Source Review provisions of the Clean Air
Act
Dear Administrator Whitman,
I strongly oppose the EPA's proposal
to roll back the clean air
protections contained in the
Clean Air Act. The changes that you have
announced would
allow companies to increase pollution from power
plants,
oil refineries, and manufacturing facilities without
installing modern pollution controls and without regard for
the harm
inflicted on public health and the environment.
Your agency has acknowledged
that the soot and smog caused by
industrial air
pollution are responsible for tens of thousands of
asthma attacks, hospitalizations, and premature deaths every
year. If
your proposed gutting of the Clean Air Act's
New Source Review
program takes effect, the amount of
harmful soot and smog pollution
in our skies would be
allowed to increase radically all across
America. This
excess pollution would result in unacceptable increases
in death and disease, more acid rain destroying our lakes
and forests
and more haze ruining our national parks.
Please stop listening to the
lobbyists for the coal, oil and power
industries and
start listening to the American people. We want to
move
forward in the fight against air pollution, not backward. More
loopholes for corporate polluters will only cause more
pollution,
more death, more disease, and more
environmental damage.
I urge you
to drop your announced changes to the New Source Review
program, and to keep our clean air laws strong for us and
for future
generations.
Sincerely,
[Your name and address]
==========================
Updates
on Previous alerts
==========================
1. HOMELAND SECURITY LEGISLATION
In our last alert we asked you to urge your senators and
representatives to strike language from the Homeland
Security Act
that would exempt companies that
voluntarily provide information
relating to "critical
infrastructure" from public disclosure
requirements and
civil liability laws. You sent more than 8,000
messages
(thank you!), and here's where the bill currently stands: A
Senate committee reached a bipartisan compromise (thanks
partly to
your efforts) to significantly narrow the
exemption to only
information concerning security
vulnerabilities that the government
presently doesn't
receive. But similar efforts failed in the House,
where
the harmful exemption provision remains intact. Differences in
the House and Senate versions ultimately will need to be
resolved in
conference committee when Congress returns
from its August recess;
we'll keep you posted.
2. NATIONAL FOREST PROTECTION
Last month we asked you to urge your representatives to
support an
amendment that would protect roadless areas
in our national forests.
Thousands of you contacted your
reps, and while many of them were
committed to voting
for such protection, ultimately the vote did not
occur.
The key sponsors of the legislation were not able to get
approval from the House parliamentarian for amendment
language that
would truly protect roadless areas, and
did not want to submit an
amendment that was only sham
protection. We expect the issue to
re-surface in the
future, so stay tuned (and thanks to all who took
action
and helped so much to raise congressional awareness).
==================================================
About Our Bulletins/How to Subscribe & Unsubscribe
==================================================
NRDC distributes three bulletins by
email. To subscribe to any or all
of them or to join our
activist networks, go to:
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/subscribe.asp.
EARTH ACTION is sent biweekly and
calls out urgent environmental
issues requiring
immediate action. To unsubscribe from Earth Action,
send
an email message to earthaction@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in
the subject line.
LEGISLATIVE WATCH is sent biweekly when Congress is in
session and
tracks environmental bills moving through
the federal legislature. To
unsubscribe from Legislative
Watch, send an email message to
legwatch@nrdcaction.org
with REMOVE in the subject line.
The CALIFORNIA ACTIVIST NETWORK ACTION ALERT is distributed
monthly
to members of NRDC's California Activist Network
and provides action
tools to Californians and others
concerned with protecting the
state's natural resources
and the health of its citizens.
==========
About NRDC
==========
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a nonprofit
environmental
organization with over 500,000 members
nationwide and a staff of
scientists, attorneys and
environmental experts. Our mission is to
protect the
planet's wildlife and wild places and ensure a safe and
healthy environment for all living things.
For more information about NRDC or
how to become a member of NRDC,
please contact us at:
Natural Resources Defense
Council
40 West 20th Street
New
York, NY 10011
212-727-4511 (voice) / 212-727-1773 (fax)
General email: nrdcinfo@nrdc.org
Earth Action email: nrdcaction@nrdc.org
http://www.nrdc.org
Also visit:
BioGems -- Saving
Endangered Wild Places
A project of the Natural
Resources Defense Council
http://www.savebiogems.org
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||